Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Wed, 12 Aug 2020 13:40:35 +0800
From:   Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
To:     Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc:     Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
        Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@linux.alibaba.com>,
        akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/10] mm/hugetlb: not necessary to abuse temporary page
 to workaround the nasty free_huge_page
Message-ID: <20200812054035.GD10792@MiWiFi-R3L-srv>
References: <20200807091251.12129-1-richard.weiyang@linux.alibaba.com>
 <20200807091251.12129-11-richard.weiyang@linux.alibaba.com>
 <20200810021737.GV14854@MiWiFi-R3L-srv>
 <129cc03e-c6d5-24f8-2f3c-f5a3cc821e76@oracle.com>
 <20200811015148.GA10792@MiWiFi-R3L-srv>
 <20200811065406.GC4793@dhcp22.suse.cz>
 <eb9d1e13-7455-0c4e-1f94-0c859c36c0bb@oracle.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <eb9d1e13-7455-0c4e-1f94-0c859c36c0bb@oracle.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 08/11/20 at 02:43pm, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> Here is a patch to do that.  However, we are optimizing a return path in
> a race condition that we are unlikely to ever hit.  I 'tested' it by allocating
> an 'extra' page and freeing it via this method in alloc_surplus_huge_page.
> 
> From 864c5f8ef4900c95ca3f6f2363a85f3cb25e793e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
> Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2020 12:45:41 -0700
> Subject: [PATCH] hugetlb: optimize race error return in
>  alloc_surplus_huge_page
> 
> The routine alloc_surplus_huge_page() could race with with a pool
> size change.  If this happens, the allocated page may not be needed.
> To free the page, the current code will 'Abuse temporary page to
> workaround the nasty free_huge_page codeflow'.  Instead, directly
> call the low level routine that free_huge_page uses.  This works
> out well because the page is new, we hold the only reference and
> already hold the hugetlb_lock.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
> ---
>  mm/hugetlb.c | 13 ++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
> index 590111ea6975..ac89b91fba86 100644
> --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
> +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
> @@ -1923,14 +1923,17 @@ static struct page *alloc_surplus_huge_page(struct hstate *h, gfp_t gfp_mask,
>  	/*
>  	 * We could have raced with the pool size change.
>  	 * Double check that and simply deallocate the new page
> -	 * if we would end up overcommiting the surpluses. Abuse
> -	 * temporary page to workaround the nasty free_huge_page
> -	 * codeflow
> +	 * if we would end up overcommiting the surpluses.
>  	 */
>  	if (h->surplus_huge_pages >= h->nr_overcommit_huge_pages) {
> -		SetPageHugeTemporary(page);
> +		/*
> +		 * Since this page is new, we hold the only reference, and
> +		 * we already hold the hugetlb_lock call the low level free
> +		 * page routine.  This saves at least a lock roundtrip.
> +		 */
> +		(void)put_page_testzero(page); /* don't call destructor */
> +		update_and_free_page(h, page);

Yeah, taking this code change, or keeping the temporary page way as is,
both looks good.

>  		spin_unlock(&hugetlb_lock);
> -		put_page(page);
>  		return NULL;
>  	} else {
>  		h->surplus_huge_pages++;