Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:a0d1:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp429999pxa; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 05:54:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzfahv9kUfYj8tp84i/8iQKPU+0jWTY3APv8xcVrf2jNg+XFK1vnD/cbN9JMvJBX6jLWDgU X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:8318:: with SMTP id j24mr30211764ejx.409.1597236848720; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 05:54:08 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1597236848; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=hoFSezwXcQnkMyvM1KIYWiyUoZ5xmFTUlGcnlCU/8Lw3oQwC5dYpIWElbkrSZlFyCB G9Me6jc8OPWp/YjXSuUdrsCpNYb0dlNj5Tb/6581wcNY0XvYdxqcS5KZpxV/wI5ZC0k0 yvS1AFkuwY4nx8dbyVFIi214N7MaKbITmcU7Rv/T/KJLdXkCpRLqkRj6VFwf2/FFohBh 5s08HoyPm+q+ot98S+nsyAb3DxkIAXqjnVKUdOd32D4ohCUBmxK1JVfJspTbKBtfRhB4 6ONbGFeWYzHMT3soO5atmNo4D/p4iLptumRMYeX5bl/6CA9zg0dqtn7xh6146Xbftlut YOmg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from; bh=/3n7hdM09FU0/S6auan9OmjkcwxPvgI4WUPgoCilsIc=; b=PUS5XzJnrVP+EWAcUqAIEKmj4tOPwP3xztihtXVEE2JYgB+NAhX8u+qhqJBNY/RFs5 IQLWKvYl7jWLCJvAgsVz/v0IySJDRMS2Tk08S5HtWU67fX8ap5wSBeBQGBAmOwVCuOKO LVKxlHCts2L73M+EDRJn9EI1rZUV1hVqYchPGhInlI6A644C/MsQbu6Vrf7ifP5PFWVX BCb9dQbfHBDR5YyV8BZZeQhI+lK7h2ZWkWjbkCiYoTOJ/TxlozuxQVs1J0xH9s5we3Zs 9GzmKeIHGb/IQRr+oa0wCejWVvWLfR0fxF7hhIiilnxn0o72DIjh/m4szrkYhjLhxu/q XA6w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id h12si1274124ejx.85.2020.08.12.05.53.45; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 05:54:08 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727870AbgHLMxN (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 12 Aug 2020 08:53:13 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:44490 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726698AbgHLMxN (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Aug 2020 08:53:13 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFEE331B; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 05:53:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from e113632-lin.cambridge.arm.com (e113632-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.194.46]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 7AA023F70D; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 05:53:11 -0700 (PDT) From: Valentin Schneider To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: mingo@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, morten.rasmussen@arm.com, Quentin Perret Subject: [PATCH v5 00/17] sched: Instrument sched domain flags Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 13:52:43 +0100 Message-Id: <20200812125300.11889-1-valentin.schneider@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.27.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, I've repeatedly stared at an SD flag and asked myself "how should that be set up in the domain hierarchy anyway?". I figured that if we formalize our flags zoology a bit, we could also do some runtime assertions on them - this is what this series is all about. Patches ======= The idea is to associate the flags with metaflags that describes how they should be set in a sched domain hierarchy ("if this SD has it, all its {parents, children} have it") or how they behave wrt degeneration - details are in the comments and commit logs. The good thing is that the debugging bits go away when CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG isn't set. The bad thing is that this replaces SD_* flags definitions with some unsavoury macros. This is mainly because I wanted to avoid having to duplicate work between declaring the flags and declaring their metaflags. Conceptually they are pretty close to the macros used for SCHED_FEAT. o Patches 1-2 remove a derelict flag and align the arm scheduler topology with arm64's o Patches 3-8 instrument SD flags with metadata and add assertions o Patches 9-10 are additional topology cleanups o Patches 11-16 each add a new flag to SD_DEGENERATE_GROUPS_MASK o Patch 17 leverage the previous 6 patches to further factorize domain degeneration Revisions ========= v4 -> v5 -------- The final git diff between v4 and v5 isn't too big; there is no diff on the domain degeneration side of things, it has just been split up in more patches. o Shuffled the series around to facilitate bisection (Ingo) I kept the arm bits at the start because that was a bit simpler, and in the unlikely case that needs to be reverted it won't be too hard. o Split the degeneration mask tweak into individual commits per new flag (Ingo) o Collected Reviewed-by from Dietmar; since I shuffled the whole lot I didn't keep your Tested-by, sorry! o Turned the SD flags into an enum with automagic power of 2 assignment. I poked the dwarves and they assured me the SD flag values haven't changed. o [new patch] Made SD flag debug file output flag names v3 -> v4 -------- o Reordered the series to have fixes / cleanups first o Added SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY propagation (Quentin) o Made ARM revert back to the default sched topology (Dietmar) o Removed SD_SERIALIZE degeneration special case (Peter) o Made SD_NUMA and SD_SERIALIZE have SDF_NEEDS_GROUPS As discussed on v3, I thought this wasn't required, but thinking some more about it there can be cases where that changes the current behaviour. For instance, in the following wacky triangle: 0\ 30 | \ 20 | 2 | / 1/ 30 there are two unique distances thus two NUMA topology levels, however the first one for node 2 would have the same span as its child domain and thus should be degenerated. If we don't give SD_NUMA and SD_SERIALIZE SDF_NEEDS_GROUPS, this domain wouldn't be denegerated since its child *doesn't* have either SD_NUMA or SD_SERIALIZE (it's the first NUMA domain), and we'd have this weird NUMA domain lingering with a single group. v2 -> v3 -------- o Reworded comment for SD_OVERLAP (it's about the groups, not the domains) o Added more flags to the SD degeneration mask o Added generation of an SD flag mask for the degeneration functions (Peter) RFC -> v2 --------- o Rebased on top of tip/sched/core o Aligned wording of comments between flags o Rectified some flag descriptions (Morten) o Added removal of SD_SHARE_POWERDOMAIN (Morten) Valentin Schneider (17): ARM, sched/topology: Remove SD_SHARE_POWERDOMAIN ARM: Revert back to default scheduler topology. sched/topology: Split out SD_* flags declaration to its own file sched/topology: Define and assign sched_domain flag metadata sched/topology: Verify SD_* flags setup when sched_debug is on sched/debug: Output SD flag names rather than their values sched/topology: Introduce SD metaflag for flags needing > 1 groups sched/topology: Use prebuilt SD flag degeneration mask sched/topology: Remove SD_SERIALIZE degeneration special case sched/topology: Propagate SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY upwards sched/topology: Mark SD_PREFER_SIBLING as SDF_NEEDS_GROUPS sched/topology: Mark SD_BALANCE_WAKE as SDF_NEEDS_GROUPS sched/topology: Mark SD_SERIALIZE as SDF_NEEDS_GROUPS sched/topology: Mark SD_ASYM_PACKING as SDF_NEEDS_GROUPS sched/topology: Mark SD_OVERLAP as SDF_NEEDS_GROUPS sched/topology: Mark SD_NUMA as SDF_NEEDS_GROUPS sched/topology: Expand use of SD_DEGENERATE_GROUPS_MASK to flags not needing groups arch/arm/kernel/topology.c | 26 ------ include/linux/sched/sd_flags.h | 156 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ include/linux/sched/topology.h | 45 +++++++--- kernel/sched/debug.c | 53 ++++++++++- kernel/sched/topology.c | 54 ++++++------ 5 files changed, 265 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-) create mode 100644 include/linux/sched/sd_flags.h -- 2.27.0