Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
References: <20200812125300.11889-7-valentin.schneider@arm.com> <20200812175958.GA94389@b1d876c4bf9f>
User-agent: mu4e 0.9.17; emacs 26.3
From:   Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
To:     kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        kbuild-all@lists.01.org, mingo@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
        vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
        morten.rasmussen@arm.com, Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/debug: fix noderef.cocci warnings
In-reply-to: <20200812175958.GA94389@b1d876c4bf9f>
Date:   Wed, 12 Aug 2020 19:52:07 +0100
Message-ID: <jhjo8nf66js.mognet@arm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk


On 12/08/20 18:59, kernel test robot wrote:
> From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
>
> kernel/sched/debug.c:272:30-36: ERROR: application of sizeof to pointer
>
>  sizeof when applied to a pointer typed expression gives the size of
>  the pointer
>
> Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/misc/noderef.cocci
>
> CC: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> ---
>
> url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Valentin-Schneider/sched-Instrument-sched-domain-flags/20200812-205638
> base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git 949bcb8135a96a6923e676646bd29cbe69e8350f
>
>  debug.c |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> --- a/kernel/sched/debug.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/debug.c
> @@ -269,7 +269,7 @@ static int sd_ctl_doflags(struct ctl_tab
>               return 0;
>       }
>
> -	tmp = kcalloc(data_size + 1, sizeof(tmp), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	tmp = kcalloc(data_size + 1, sizeof(*tmp), GFP_KERNEL);

Praised be coccinelle for rubbing in my face that I can't write code; also
I'm not even checking if the allocation succeeded which is clearly daft,
even if this is debug stuff. I'll blame the heat and try to move on...

>       for_each_set_bit(idx, &flags, __SD_FLAG_CNT) {
>               char *name = sd_flag_debug[idx].name;
>