Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org 1FFB5C433C6
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/7] pinctrl: qcom: Use return value from irq_set_wake
 call
To:     Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>, bjorn.andersson@linaro.org,
        evgreen@chromium.org, linus.walleij@linaro.org, maz@kernel.org,
        mka@chromium.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, agross@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
        jason@lakedaemon.net, dianders@chromium.org, rnayak@codeaurora.org,
        ilina@codeaurora.org, lsrao@codeaurora.org
References: <1597058460-16211-1-git-send-email-mkshah@codeaurora.org>
 <1597058460-16211-3-git-send-email-mkshah@codeaurora.org>
 <159717444178.1360974.6520145243224264090@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
From:   Maulik Shah <mkshah@codeaurora.org>
Message-ID: <aa506a3d-3e89-08ed-2d66-7098f6e5af91@codeaurora.org>
Date:   Thu, 13 Aug 2020 12:47:18 +0530
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.11.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <159717444178.1360974.6520145243224264090@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-GB
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi,

On 8/12/2020 1:04 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Maulik Shah (2020-08-10 04:20:55)
>> msmgpio irqchip is not using return value of irq_set_wake call.
>> Start using it.
> Does this work when the irq parent isn't setup in a hierarchy?
yes it works fine even when parent isn't setup in hierarchy.
> I seem to
> recall that this was written this way because sometimes
> irq_set_irq_wake() would fail for the summary irq so it was a best
> effort setting of wake on the summary line.
Thanks for pointing this.

It was written this way since previously GIC driver neither had 
IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE flag nor it implemented .irq_set_wake callback,

so the call to irq_set_irq_wake() to set_irq_wake_real() used to return 
error -ENXIO in past.

I see this is already taken care now in GIC drivers by adding 
IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE flag.

>
>> Fixes: e35a6ae0eb3a ("pinctrl/msm: Setup GPIO chip in hierarchy")
>> Signed-off-by: Maulik Shah <mkshah@codeaurora.org>
>> Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
>> ---
>>   drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c | 8 +++-----
>>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c
>> index 90edf61..c264561 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c
>> @@ -1077,12 +1077,10 @@ static int msm_gpio_irq_set_wake(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int on)
>>           * when TLMM is powered on. To allow that, enable the GPIO
>>           * summary line to be wakeup capable at GIC.
>>           */
>> -       if (d->parent_data)
>> -               irq_chip_set_wake_parent(d, on);
>> -
>> -       irq_set_irq_wake(pctrl->irq, on);
>> +       if (d->parent_data && test_bit(d->hwirq, pctrl->skip_wake_irqs))
>> +               return irq_chip_set_wake_parent(d, on);
> So this bit is probably fine.
>
>>   
>> -       return 0;
>> +       return irq_set_irq_wake(pctrl->irq, on);
> But this one is probably not fine.

As per above both of them are fine.

Thanks,
Maulik

>
>>   }
>>   
>>   static int msm_gpio_irq_reqres(struct irq_data *d)

-- 
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation