Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Thu, 13 Aug 2020 10:52:52 +0200
From:   Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>
To:     Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Cc:     Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>,
        David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
        Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>,
        Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>,
        Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com>,
        Christian Brauner <christian@brauner.io>,
        Lennart Poettering <lennart@poettering.net>,
        Linux API <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>,
        Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net>,
        LSM <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: file metadata via fs API
Message-ID: <20200813085252.ezwd46ahyjiz4flh@ws.net.home>
References: <20200811135419.GA1263716@miu.piliscsaba.redhat.com>
 <CAHk-=wjzLmMRf=QG-n+1HnxWCx4KTQn9+OhVvUSJ=ZCQd6Y1WA@mail.gmail.com>
 <52483.1597190733@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
 <CAJfpegt=cQ159kEH9zCYVHV7R_08jwMxF0jKrSUV5E=uBg4Lzw@mail.gmail.com>
 <98802.1597220949@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
 <CAJfpegsVJo9e=pHf3YGWkE16fT0QaNGhgkUdq4KUQypXaD=OgQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <d2d179c7-9b60-ca1a-0c9f-d308fc7af5ce@redhat.com>
 <CAJfpeguMjU+n-JXE6aUQQGeMpCS4bsy4HQ37NHJ8aD8Aeg2qhA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20200812112825.b52tqeuro2lquxlw@ws.net.home>
 <CAJfpegv4sC2zm+N5tvEmYaEFvvWJRHfdGqXUoBzbeKj81uNCvQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAJfpegv4sC2zm+N5tvEmYaEFvvWJRHfdGqXUoBzbeKj81uNCvQ@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 02:43:32PM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 1:28 PM Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> > The proposal is based on paths and open(), how do you plan to deal
> > with mount IDs? David's fsinfo() allows to ask for mount info by mount
> > ID and it works well with mount notification where you get the ID. The
> > collaboration with notification interface is critical for our use-cases.
> 
> One would use the notification to keep an up to date set of attributes
> for each watched mount, right?
> 
> That presumably means the mount ID <-> mount path mapping already
> exists, which means it's just possible to use the open(mount_path,
> O_PATH) to obtain the base fd.

The notification also reports new mount nodes, so we have no mount ID
<-> mount path mapping in userspace yet.

The another problem is that open(path) cannot be used if you have multiple
filesystems on the same mount point -- in this case (at least in theory)
you can get ID for by-path inaccessible filesystem.

> A new syscall that returns an fd pointing to the root of the mount
> might be the best solution:
> 
>    int open_mount(int root_fd, u64 mntid, int flags);

Yes, something like this is necessary. You do not want to depend
on paths if you want to read information about mountpoints.

 Karel

-- 
 Karel Zak  <kzak@redhat.com>
 http://karelzak.blogspot.com