Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Thu, 13 Aug 2020 12:18:34 +0100
From:   Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To:     Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc:     Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>,
        Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
        Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huawei.com>,
        "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
        Igor Lubashev <ilubashe@akamai.com>,
        Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
        Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>,
        Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
        James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        john.garry@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Perf tool: Enable Arm arch timer counter and
 arm-spe's timestamp
Message-ID: <20200813111833.GA10098@willie-the-truck>
References: <20200807071620.11907-1-leo.yan@linaro.org>
 <CANLsYkzR+DSrss0dzPjMPKW+4ZGMbD9V23PLDSZAJM1-SQU0CQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20200812185334.GN13995@kernel.org>
 <20200813095901.GB9894@willie-the-truck>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200813095901.GB9894@willie-the-truck>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

[ Adding John, as I only just realised he wasn't on CC and we were talking
  about him! ]

On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 10:59:01AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 03:53:34PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Em Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 10:06:53AM -0600, Mathieu Poirier escreveu:
> > > The ARM SPE perf tools code is orphan and I don't have the cycles to
> > > pick it up.  Leo has spent a lot of time in that code and as such I
> > > suggest that he starts maintaining it, probably following the same
> > > kind of arrangement you and I have for coresight.
> > 
> > Thats ok with me, I think we should reflect that on the MAINTAINERS
> > file, right?
> > 
> > We have this already:
> > 
> > PERFORMANCE EVENTS SUBSYSTEM ARM64 PMU EVENTS
> > R:      John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
> > R:      Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> > L:      linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org (moderated for non-subscribers)
> > S:      Supported
> > F:      tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/arm64/
> > 
> > I think we should have entries for CoreSight and ARM SPE, one listing
> > you as the maintainer and the other listing Leo, right?
> 
> Fine by me. I'll continue to maintain the in-kernel SPE driver, but I'd love
> to see somebody step up to looking after the userspace code. It's seriously
> unloved on arm64 :(
> 
> I'd even be happy to see one or two M: entries added for
> tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/arm64/. I realistically don't have the time to
> take that on, but I'd be thrilled if any/all of John, Mathieu and Leo were
> to be listed there if they are willing to do so and can spare the time to
> look after it. Even just silly things like making sure the thing
> cross-compiles have been broken in the recent past, so it's not necessarily
> about handling huge amounts of incoming patches.
> 
> In other words, rather than slice up the arm64 parts of the perf tool, I'd
> argue in favour of a joint maintainership model for all the arm64 bits, if
> we have a few willing volunteers.
> 
> Will