Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20200813075125.4949-1-cmo@melexis.com> <20200813075125.4949-6-cmo@melexis.com>
 <CAHp75Vd0D_jq7S=ANLJ-JSTb6iD1vHVRs2cN25Y3sNWCC9L2Xw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHp75Vd0D_jq7S=ANLJ-JSTb6iD1vHVRs2cN25Y3sNWCC9L2Xw@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Crt Mori <cmo@melexis.com>
Date:   Thu, 13 Aug 2020 15:11:32 +0200
Message-ID: <CAKv63uvrrc6Qfr2FjzgnNsHC0maZWT1Zpo=WQZvMmGgtYL6-tw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 5/5] iio:temperature:mlx90632: Some stylefixing leftovers
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Cc:     Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>,
        linux-iio <linux-iio@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, 13 Aug 2020 at 13:01, Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 10:53 AM Crt Mori <cmo@melexis.com> wrote:
> >
> > There is some inconsistency and whitespace cleanup performed in this
> > patch. It was done on top of my other patches, but I can rebase to head
> > of the togreg branch if it would go in sooner.
>
> ...
>
> > -#define MLX90632_REF_12                12LL /**< ResCtrlRef value of Ch 1 or Ch 2 */
> > -#define MLX90632_REF_3         12LL /**< ResCtrlRef value of Channel 3 */
> > -#define MLX90632_MAX_MEAS_NUM  31 /**< Maximum measurements in list */
> > -#define MLX90632_SLEEP_DELAY_MS 3000 /**< Autosleep delay */
>
>
> > +#define MLX90632_REF_12        12LL /* ResCtrlRef value of Ch 1 or Ch 2 */
> > +#define MLX90632_REF_3         12LL /* ResCtrlRef value of Channel 3 */
> > +#define MLX90632_MAX_MEAS_NUM  31 /* Maximum measurements in list */
> > +#define MLX90632_SLEEP_DELAY_MS 3000 /* Autosleep delay */
> >  #define MLX90632_EXTENDED_LIMIT 27000 /* Extended mode raw value limit */
>
> This was actually in doxy (perhaps kernel doc also understands this)
> format of description.
> Can you double check that the kernel doc is okay / not okay with it?
>
> If it is okay, perhaps it's better to convert others to that format
> rather than dropping it.
>
It is indeed from doxygen and looking at other drivers it should not
be OK. I checked the docs and it does not say in fact. Maybe Jonathan
knows, but he was already OK with these changes in v1.
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko