Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org-S932199AbWEQMFK@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S932199AbWEQMFK (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Wed, 17 May 2006 08:05:10 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932210AbWEQMFK
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Wed, 17 May 2006 08:05:10 -0400
Received: from tornado.reub.net ([202.89.145.182]:59576 "EHLO tornado.reub.net")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932199AbWEQMFI (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 17 May 2006 08:05:08 -0400
Message-ID: <446B1158.8030608@reub.net>
Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 00:04:40 +1200
From: Reuben Farrelly <reuben-lkml@reub.net>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 3.0a1 (Windows/20060516)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
CC: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
       Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 000 of 3] md: Introduction - 3 bugfixs for -mm
References: <20060516111036.2649.patches@notabene>
In-Reply-To: <20060516111036.2649.patches@notabene>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1491
Lines: 46

On 16/05/2006 1:12 p.m., NeilBrown wrote:
> The first of these fixes issues with the new bmap based bitmap file
> access code, and possibly should be an -mm hotfix, and without it,
> 'internal' bitmaps don't work any more :-(
> 
> Others are minor and unrelated.
> 
> Thanks,
> NeilBrown
> 
> 
>  [PATCH 001 of 3] md: Change md/bitmap file handling to use bmap to file blocks-fix
>  [PATCH 002 of 3] md: Fix inverted test for 'repair' directive.
>  [PATCH 003 of 3] md: Calculate correct array size for raid10 in new offset mode.

Patch 1 fixes the problems I was having with RAID-1 arrays not able to start up 
on 2.6.17-rc4-mm1.  Thanks for that.

However things appear still not quite right on boot, as each mount works but 
displays as though it didn't work, ie:

md: considering sdc2 ...
md:  adding sdc2 ...
md:  adding sda2 ...
md: created md0
md: bind<sda2>
md: bind<sdc2>
md: running: <sdc2><sda2>
raid1: raid set md0 active with 0 out of 2 mirrors

0 out of 2 ?

cat /proc/mdstats  shows that everything does in fact seem to be working:

md0 : active raid1 sdc2[1] sda2[0]
       24410688 blocks [2/2] [UU]
       bitmap: 21/187 pages [84KB], 64KB chunk

The array otherwise seems to be fine.  I guess it's just a visual glitch.

reuben
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/