Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1597368611-7631-1-git-send-email-zhaoyang.huang@unisoc.com>
 <20200814014355.GS17456@casper.infradead.org> <20200814020700.GT17456@casper.infradead.org>
 <CAGWkznEkTeTq4-wPKBcNsF2vF5SVaFc3xoZmceKSwg34vpkqbg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAGWkznEkTeTq4-wPKBcNsF2vF5SVaFc3xoZmceKSwg34vpkqbg@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Zhaoyang Huang <huangzhaoyang@gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 14 Aug 2020 10:26:23 +0800
Message-ID: <CAGWkznGUBp+dHk3NugBzfftObosjH7Gg4s8C-AwkQBr5fM6-gw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm : update ra->ra_pages if it's NOT equal to bdi->ra_pages
To:     Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc:     Roman Gushchin <klamm@yandex-team.ru>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Zhaoyang Huang <zhaoyang.huang@unisoc.com>,
        "open list:MEMORY MANAGEMENT" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 10:20 AM Zhaoyang Huang <huangzhaoyang@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 10:07 AM Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 02:43:55AM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 09:30:11AM +0800, Zhaoyang Huang wrote:
> > > > file->f_ra->ra_pages will remain the initialized value since it opend, which may
> > > > be NOT equal to bdi->ra_pages as the latter one is updated somehow(etc,
> > > > echo xxx > /sys/block/dm/queue/read_ahead_kb).So sync ra->ra_pages to the
> > > > updated value when sync read.
> > >
> > > It still ignores the work done by shrink_readahead_size_eio()
> > > and fadvise(POSIX_FADV_SEQUENTIAL).
> >
> > ... by the way, if you're trying to update one particular file's readahead
> > state, you can just call fadvise(POSIX_FADV_NORMAL) on it.
> >
> > If you want to update every open file's ra_pages by writing to sysfs,
> > then just no.  We don't do that.
> No, What I want to fix is the file within one process's context  keeps
> using the initialized value when it is opened and not sync with new
> value when bdi->ra_pages changes.
So you mean it is just the desired behavior as having the opened file
use the initialized value even if bdi->ra_pages changed via sysfs?
> >
> > You haven't said what problem you're facing, so I really can't be more
> > helpful.