Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932541AbWEQMjj (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 May 2006 08:39:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932543AbWEQMjj (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 May 2006 08:39:39 -0400 Received: from web26605.mail.ukl.yahoo.com ([217.146.176.55]:20851 "HELO web26605.mail.ukl.yahoo.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S932541AbWEQMji (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 May 2006 08:39:38 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.fr; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=cfcW5LSEqcrLVCRdtiOkwARUMDXCKac1Pl2xvAIjoHe9VFXSJKIrQMWzSPYW5Y/b5romfaJDuA/qG/wJaNOkEIy65/vEgRI7aTpm3CCgXRJhz+EEROwwWTAywt/YWbpbemgDrNcfRkLU0qe1oyyKrTFYwzYcvztvdnD5SsuHpZA= ; Message-ID: <20060517123937.75295.qmail@web26605.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 14:39:37 +0200 (CEST) From: linux cbon Subject: Re: replacing X Window System ! To: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <200605171218.k4HCIt4L013978@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1777 Lines: 55 --- Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu a ?crit : > On Wed, 17 May 2006 13:47:22 +0200, linux cbon said: > > If it isn't backward compatible, people won't use > it. X may suck, > but it doesn't suck hard enough that people will > abandon all their > currently mostly-working software. If we have a new window system, shall all applications be rewritten ? > Actually, you've proved the opposite. Consider if > the kernel had *already* > included some universal window system (we'll call it > W). At that point, you > can't easily write an X, Y, or Z if you don't like > W. If anything, the > *current* W (which happens to be called X11) is > *too* friendly with the kernel > already - witness all the headaches dealing with DRM > and 'enable' attributes > and other hoops things have to jump through. > > If anything, there should be even *less* kernel > support for graphics. > That way, writing a Y or Z (or improving X) is > easier to do without > destabilizing the kernel. My idea is that the kernel should include universal graphical support. And then we would NOT need ANY window system AT ALL. We wouldnt have 2 os (kernel and X) at the same time like now. It would be faster, simpler, easier to manage etc. ___________________________________________________________________________ Faites de Yahoo! votre page d'accueil sur le web pour retrouver directement vos services pr?f?r?s : v?rifiez vos nouveaux mails, lancez vos recherches et suivez l'actualit? en temps r?el. Rendez-vous sur http://fr.yahoo.com/set - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/