Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
IronPort-SDR: qc3QO0RWv3PDkKWWUnzAvTB3m1g11J8gI61bOogi8VRRUGjjDdgIhsv142EBIXi6bIpJGyw9t9
 Ku0mZ16r6Rxg==
IronPort-SDR: 545gqfD32bKwafgjhPqXEZJ/MY8MH2jMl8R6xD4Y1UwfyHWY5cxN1DzxA7dp7Ew+2hDGUaO/P8
 hx+H8DlmnLWg==
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/6] Support running driver's probe for a device
 powered off
From:   Bingbu Cao <bingbu.cao@linux.intel.com>
To:     Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>,
        linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
        linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Bingbu Cao <bingbu.cao@intel.com>,
        linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
        Chiranjeevi Rapolu <chiranjeevi.rapolu@intel.com>,
        Hyungwoo Yang <hyungwoo.yang@intel.com>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        rajmohan.mani@intel.com, Tomasz Figa <tfiga@chromium.org>,
        "Qiu, Tian Shu" <tian.shu.qiu@intel.com>
References: <20200810142747.12400-1-sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
 <5353041e-850f-05ad-3b20-35e91fc9501e@linux.intel.com>
Message-ID: <aca32190-076e-d047-6988-1a5858f84945@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Fri, 14 Aug 2020 14:18:10 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <5353041e-850f-05ad-3b20-35e91fc9501e@linux.intel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk


On 8/14/20 12:11 PM, Bingbu Cao wrote:
> 
> 
> On 8/10/20 10:27 PM, Sakari Ailus wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
> ...snip...
>>
>> The use case is such that there is a privacy LED next to an integrated
>> user-facing laptop camera, and this LED is there to signal the user that
>> the camera is recording a video or capturing images. That LED also happens
>> to be wired to one of the power supplies of the camera, so whenever you
>> power on the camera, the LED will be lit, whether images are captured from
>> the camera --- or not. There's no way to implement this differently
>> without additional software control (allowing of which is itself a
>> hardware design decision) on most CSI-2-connected camera sensors as they
>> simply have no pin to signal the camera streaming state.
>>
>> This is also what happens during driver probe: the camera will be powered
>> on by the I?C subsystem calling dev_pm_domain_attach() and the device is
>> already powered on when the driver's own probe function is called. To the
>> user this visible during the boot process as a blink of the privacy LED,
>> suggesting that the camera is recording without the user having used an
>> application to do that. From the end user's point of view the behaviour is
>> not expected and for someone unfamiliar with internal workings of a
>> computer surely seems quite suspicious --- even if images are not being
>> actually captured.
>>
>> I've tested these on linux-next master. They also apply to Wolfram's
>> i2c/for-next branch, there's a patch that affects the I?C core changes
>> here (see below). The patches apart from that apply to Bartosz's
>> at24/for-next as well as Mauro's linux-media master branch.
> 
> Sakari, we meet one issue - once the vcm sub-device registered, the user space
> will try to open the VCM (I have not figure out who did that), it will also
> trigger the acpi pm resume/suspend, as the VCM always shares same power rail
> with camera sensor, so the privacy LED still has a blink.
Sakari, please ignore my previous comment, it is not related to this change. I
see the sub device open is caused by v4l_id program from udev.

> 
>>
> ...snip...
> 

-- 
Best regards,
Bingbu Cao