Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750771AbWEQOxh (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 May 2006 10:53:37 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750809AbWEQOxh (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 May 2006 10:53:37 -0400 Received: from web26611.mail.ukl.yahoo.com ([217.146.177.63]:43355 "HELO web26611.mail.ukl.yahoo.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1750771AbWEQOxh (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 May 2006 10:53:37 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.fr; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=IKMPnHdaPOaXXjw8fVcWVi+qSoW+zwG12UUp7rD0nED3q3v5gxMw+tDjeKB2z+QqtLIdXGyVJl9p1zfTJp8aC+1Fx7HoADWEFziK72mOAlGlfOBQ9aNDmuygvBe+vO0EjLYnURqHkHnVfmxEWIrd2Np8jgHTmWWItZK8s1sa+sM= ; Message-ID: <20060517145335.36079.qmail@web26611.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 16:53:35 +0200 (CEST) From: linux cbon Subject: Re: replacing X Window System ! To: Jesper Juhl Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <9a8748490605170639n12fde7c9i836599f02a30fd51@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1491 Lines: 54 --- Jesper Juhl a ?crit : > And when the windowing system crashes it'll take the > kernel down with it - ouch. It is already happening today with X, because : X runs as root - ouch. X can write into kernel memory - ouch. X can mess with clocks - ouch. X can mess with PCI bus - ouch. etc. - ouch. > And if I want to run a headless server without a > graphical display I > can't simply stop the windowing system I'd have to > rebuild a kernel > without the windowing system in it - yuck. Is it so difficult to disable a module ? - yuck. > What we have now is a nicely decoupled system - it > would be even > better if X was even more decoupled from the kernel, > but lets not put > the windowing system in kernel space. We dont need 2 kernels like today. All "dangerous code" should be in kernel. > Do you really want to put all that complexity into > the kernel? Kernel is already complex, that wouldnt affect it. But that would greatly simplify the whole system. ___________________________________________________________________________ Nouveau : t?l?phonez moins cher avec Yahoo! Messenger. Appelez le monde entier ? partir de 0,012 ?/minute ! T?l?chargez sur http://fr.messenger.yahoo.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/