Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To:     Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Cc:     Maulik Shah <mkshah@codeaurora.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
        LinusW <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>,
        Evan Green <evgreen@chromium.org>,
        Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
        "open list\:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
        Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
        Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@codeaurora.org>,
        Lina Iyer <ilina@codeaurora.org>,
        Srinivas Rao L <lsrao@codeaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/7] genirq: Introduce irq_suspend_one() and irq_resume_one() callbacks
In-Reply-To: <CAD=FV=V1hvWZ0ANX9nsvRX_iXjuzw0X_tL2hgg4zYGgsqRtLTQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1597058460-16211-1-git-send-email-mkshah@codeaurora.org> <1597058460-16211-4-git-send-email-mkshah@codeaurora.org> <87pn7ulwr5.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> <CAD=FV=WN4R1tS47ZzdZa_hsbvLifwnv6rgETVaiea0+QSZmiOw@mail.gmail.com> <878sei42ql.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> <CAD=FV=Wyp8B6183avk4on4Akz6dANkuJ25h_o_ERDuiZ87mwNw@mail.gmail.com> <87364q3rqb.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> <CAD=FV=V1hvWZ0ANX9nsvRX_iXjuzw0X_tL2hgg4zYGgsqRtLTQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 14 Aug 2020 14:43:23 +0200
Message-ID: <87bljdl7o4.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Doug,

On Thu, Aug 13 2020 at 20:04, Doug Anderson wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 7:07 PM Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
>>    Having a quick and dirty POC for illustration is fine and usually
>>    useful.
>
> OK, I will try to remember that, in the future, I should send
> questions rather than patches to you.  I'm always learning the

The quick and dirty POC patch for illustration along with the questions
is always good to catch my attention.

> workflows of the different maintainers, so sorry for killing so much
> time.  :(

No problem. 

>> If it solves the problem and from what you explained it should do so
>> then this is definitely the right way to go.
>
> Wonderful!  Looking forward to Maulik's post doing it this way.

/me closes the case for now and moves on.

Thanks

        tglx