Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Sat, 15 Aug 2020 10:44:43 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc:     Uriel Guajardo <urielguajardojr@gmail.com>,
        brendanhiggins@google.com, mingo@redhat.com, will@kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
        kunit-dev@googlegroups.com, urielguajardo@google.com,
        alan.maguire@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] kunit: added lockdep support
Message-ID: <20200815084443.GO3982@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
References: <20200814205527.1833459-1-urielguajardojr@gmail.com>
 <20200815083029.GA2430016@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200815083029.GA2430016@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, Aug 15, 2020 at 10:30:29AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Uriel Guajardo <urielguajardojr@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > From: Uriel Guajardo <urielguajardo@google.com>
> > 
> > KUnit will fail tests upon observing a lockdep failure. Because lockdep
> > turns itself off after its first failure, only fail the first test and
> > warn users to not expect any future failures from lockdep.
> > 
> > Similar to lib/locking-selftest [1], we check if the status of
> > debug_locks has changed after the execution of a test case. However, we
> > do not reset lockdep afterwards.
> > 
> > Like the locking selftests, we also fix possible preemption count
> > corruption from lock bugs.
> 
> > --- a/lib/kunit/Makefile
> > +++ b/lib/kunit/Makefile
> 
> > +void kunit_check_lockdep(struct kunit *test, struct kunit_lockdep *lockdep) {
> > +	int saved_preempt_count = lockdep->preempt_count;
> > +	bool saved_debug_locks = lockdep->debug_locks;
> > +
> > +	if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(preempt_count() != saved_preempt_count))
> > +		preempt_count_set(saved_preempt_count);
> > +
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS
> > +	if (softirq_count())
> > +		current->softirqs_enabled = 0;
> > +	else
> > +		current->softirqs_enabled = 1;
> > +#endif
> > +
> > +	if (saved_debug_locks && !debug_locks) {
> > +		kunit_set_failure(test);
> > +		kunit_warn(test, "Dynamic analysis tool failure from LOCKDEP.");
> > +		kunit_warn(test, "Further tests will have LOCKDEP disabled.");
> > +	}
> 
> 
> So this basically duplicates what the boot-time locking self-tests do, 
> in a poor fashion?

No, it makes sure that any kunit based self-test fails when it messes up
it's locking.