Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:a0d1:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp2069070pxa; Sun, 16 Aug 2020 22:45:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwmISXehmTsLn3glXAWb9vhupb61WBavkR2vrhdPDOYcM85AgxkPSq19u6dHrd4X1d649ef X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:c310:: with SMTP id s16mr13679556ejz.466.1597643152704; Sun, 16 Aug 2020 22:45:52 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1597643152; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=d/s7tzll5nqimnzO/C4aWbDCZJX7VgzWr6gdNAzxBoEIXwY9r9c7h4CGUQrE9UXiQq 97yKMYKUF2UomuRZg54XexNLD++C8l5+wEDTegedc3ANOswf8CwgUVUBJSpY1UtqlT9q zG/fY/8mBAt+EwFMWWaG4jbFqrpSs6mUNCkpAglrc6gzyBoWKGjGs6uvUx+Yi67qcrJT 3Qbh4+yXtzhgDLfaxGGIc/J54kmZFnhaOIuOYfLUN+bwG7inAGZuaOdrUs6zRpD29s5E gZvGIMMUF2w2Eym5Y5ABeV3v8Jhisa90Kq1oqTSeZSs5HSmjtjduMEgNMeoDfWUfeyCT K68A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :dkim-signature; bh=w4CZjcR5G7HuZIhgL+P3znMvIslDa68n4SbH/LOsIcE=; b=JH425osGKfK8eXaYaGmOl7+JwUqnC7aQh/UIk84jbsmqKn2PmbKH+X1pL4yZa5v4KZ JuBs+QDwBgIakU9ZtsoR+OZu+zRFRYnoPtRhJxPpfI/JTkqY0UlHliGAGy7gNbgCoGxe qOaITun0g4Y/kuBNkYtmFSrfspCAxdJdOreUWtGgk16OM+ncp81SaQT999hagUg8y9GA elrwk+aOjlX5RkSxGCpa8QyuaKRhY6OQLQsnWB7EV+juBa/+sxt270mBJaDhfY2l42hN p9Lc8C9TfCj6j1fKionqw5JbdUNHtXkU9OdEw1o2wPsWFDLPc1+mpDSTQk3ZYh/rrB/A pB9A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=WWK7fnFd; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id y20si10700357ejj.325.2020.08.16.22.45.29; Sun, 16 Aug 2020 22:45:52 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=WWK7fnFd; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726633AbgHQFoo (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 17 Aug 2020 01:44:44 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:56042 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726267AbgHQFol (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Aug 2020 01:44:41 -0400 Received: from localhost (unknown [122.171.38.130]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 40AA3206FA; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 05:44:39 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1597643081; bh=aqIsg2MDXKpvMXXPQ5wP3TKUruW1MuQtK/g5YmaXzcE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=WWK7fnFdl1g9pGQK6EXMuPWBCnLkYmVnwL0Ico816DgwJZ7qnPvYW8LeUVio3mKoq GDZpoYgtXvhGAWMOb3wz5ccfFqGFCIUZB8wF7V3Zl1dcWkZyWyAcvFwlEoRjXys3s8 CkXd/Dq0Mu8pyinGUqt1GW7hstXXdiHteknPLIvk= Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 11:14:35 +0530 From: Vinod Koul To: Peter Ujfalusi Cc: dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, dan.j.williams@intel.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: of-dma: Fix of_dma_router_xlate's of_dma_xlate handling Message-ID: <20200817054435.GK2639@vkoul-mobl> References: <20200806104928.25975-1-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200806104928.25975-1-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 06-08-20, 13:49, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: > of_dma_xlate callback can return ERR_PTR as well NULL in case of failure. > > If error code is returned (not NULL) then the route should be released and > the router should not be registered for the channel. Applied, thanks -- ~Vinod