Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Mon, 17 Aug 2020 10:42:22 -0700
From:   Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
To:     satya priya <skakit@codeaurora.org>
Cc:     Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
        gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akashast@codeaurora.org,
        rojay@codeaurora.org, msavaliy@qti.qualcomm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 3/3] tty: serial: qcom_geni_serial: Fix the UART
 wakeup issue
Message-ID: <20200817174222.GC2995789@google.com>
References: <1595563082-2353-1-git-send-email-skakit@codeaurora.org>
 <1595563082-2353-4-git-send-email-skakit@codeaurora.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1595563082-2353-4-git-send-email-skakit@codeaurora.org>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 09:28:02AM +0530, satya priya wrote:
> As a part of system suspend we call uart_port_suspend from the
> Serial driver, which calls set_mctrl passing mctrl as NULL. This
> makes RFR high(NOT_READY) during suspend.
> 
> Due to this BT SoC is not able to send wakeup bytes to UART during
> suspend. Included if check for non-suspend case to keep RFR low
> during suspend.
> 
> Signed-off-by: satya priya <skakit@codeaurora.org>
> ---
> Changes in V2:
>  - This patch fixes the UART flow control issue during suspend.
>    Newly added in V2.
> 
>  drivers/tty/serial/qcom_geni_serial.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/qcom_geni_serial.c b/drivers/tty/serial/qcom_geni_serial.c
> index 07b7b6b..7108dfc 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/qcom_geni_serial.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/qcom_geni_serial.c
> @@ -242,7 +242,7 @@ static void qcom_geni_serial_set_mctrl(struct uart_port *uport,
>  	if (mctrl & TIOCM_LOOP)
>  		port->loopback = RX_TX_CTS_RTS_SORTED;
>  
> -	if (!(mctrl & TIOCM_RTS))
> +	if ((!(mctrl & TIOCM_RTS)) && (!(uport->suspended)))

Why all these parentheses, instead of:

    	if (!(mctrl & TIOCM_RTS) && !uport->suspended)

?