Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Mon, 17 Aug 2020 15:28:46 +0100
From:   Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
To:     Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@linaro.org>
Cc:     Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net,
        Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.com>,
        Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
        Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 2/5] serial: core: Add framework to allow NMI aware serial
 drivers
Message-ID: <20200817142846.mm46yy62illrewbq@holly.lan>
References: <1595333413-30052-1-git-send-email-sumit.garg@linaro.org>
 <1595333413-30052-3-git-send-email-sumit.garg@linaro.org>
 <CAD=FV=XUNqun3d+C_7GpgntGWRXwLSLnXKStLUz8iqZoGKu8zg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAFA6WYNq-Z5WD=AqJn2_DEg0F6G1CYte2y5Snc964vsgCnr0Bw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAD=FV=Vu3PGSUzargD-6e2XOw=Eh7CZaQ_+a09dr8SR1T8eE2g@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAFA6WYPJ_w+R15NRKK5BzZtTxKq8Gh_mGswuYbW0cYZoBYLhxw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20200814141322.lffebtamfjt2qrym@holly.lan>
 <CAFA6WYNAdELYCoOVQokgLNKhOYF9QK85UidgvyFfo4wsSNwKXw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAFA6WYNAdELYCoOVQokgLNKhOYF9QK85UidgvyFfo4wsSNwKXw@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 05:57:03PM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Aug 2020 at 19:43, Daniel Thompson
> <daniel.thompson@linaro.org> wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 04:47:11PM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote:
> > Does it look better if you create a new type to map the two structures
> > together. Alternatively are there enough existing use-cases to want to
> > extend irq_work_queue() with irq_work_schedule() or something similar?
> >
> 
> Thanks for your suggestion, irq_work_schedule() looked even better
> without any overhead, see below:
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/irq_work.h b/include/linux/irq_work.h
> index 3082378..1eade89 100644
> --- a/include/linux/irq_work.h
> +++ b/include/linux/irq_work.h
> @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
>  #define _LINUX_IRQ_WORK_H
> 
>  #include <linux/smp_types.h>
> +#include <linux/workqueue.h>
> 
>  /*
>   * An entry can be in one of four states:
> @@ -24,6 +25,11 @@ struct irq_work {
>         void (*func)(struct irq_work *);
>  };
> 
> +struct irq_work_schedule {
> +       struct irq_work work;
> +       struct work_struct *sched_work;
> +};
> +
>  static inline
>  void init_irq_work(struct irq_work *work, void (*func)(struct irq_work *))
>  {
>  {
> @@ -39,6 +45,7 @@ void init_irq_work(struct irq_work *work, void
> (*func)(struct irq_work *))
> 
>  bool irq_work_queue(struct irq_work *work);
>  bool irq_work_queue_on(struct irq_work *work, int cpu);
> +bool irq_work_schedule(struct work_struct *sched_work);
> 
>  void irq_work_tick(void);
>  void irq_work_sync(struct irq_work *work);
> diff --git a/kernel/irq_work.c b/kernel/irq_work.c
> index eca8396..3880316 100644
> --- a/kernel/irq_work.c
> +++ b/kernel/irq_work.c
> @@ -24,6 +24,8 @@
>  static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct llist_head, raised_list);
>  static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct llist_head, lazy_list);
> 
> +static struct irq_work_schedule irq_work_sched;
> +
>  /*
>   * Claim the entry so that no one else will poke at it.
>   */
> @@ -79,6 +81,25 @@ bool irq_work_queue(struct irq_work *work)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(irq_work_queue);
> 
> +static void irq_work_schedule_fn(struct irq_work *work)
> +{
> +       struct irq_work_schedule *irq_work_sched =
> +               container_of(work, struct irq_work_schedule, work);
> +
> +       if (irq_work_sched->sched_work)
> +               schedule_work(irq_work_sched->sched_work);
> +}
> +
> +/* Schedule work via irq work queue */
> +bool irq_work_schedule(struct work_struct *sched_work)
> +{
> +       init_irq_work(&irq_work_sched.work, irq_work_schedule_fn);
> +       irq_work_sched.sched_work = sched_work;
> +
> +       return irq_work_queue(&irq_work_sched.work);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(irq_work_schedule);
> +

This is irredeemably broken.

Even if we didn't care about dropping events (which we do) then when you
overwrite irq_work_sched with a copy of another work_struct, either of
which could currently be enqueued somewhere, then you will cause some
very nasty corruption.


Daniel.