Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:a0d1:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp2886051pxa; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 00:03:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxul1ElnB0mfEZZk0Xbx3k4EzuGJbi4pTlPn/sIMGN1EzOuZ+pWVlhmKmnhqwA81dEOyCWa X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:1c09:: with SMTP id ck9mr18998242edb.74.1597734188184; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 00:03:08 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1597734188; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ZaDkRBxetxMilK143/K6V/u3Yh3Pvbn+4y2BEzEsvNJtuVHIpmTJczltV+gerNeZe+ USw3hDmCueDr3Kh3jOECPkTQF1uugAyoAX9HwjSq49SJQOColrPPu3CWcDtuRrhHuuaX uQdCsIEXr/6HjNMm+xuXi7Gpm4I1flYMvu5o5oVqPGDvyeRWcJZ/R4YPQw01YBib3NCV 5aVKfepsjkC30JRORkDuTJaD/Og9EWZihl7atIfPTmJpgvrk4OFs7YyDHW/1cw2KsIyr sgvK83gLqNBHejUQFFB5uZ0V8I5j8oCjbdjItx1MXn13Yg2Q+8vU5Vt0ls50t+HZkkT+ uiQw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=37NUzz3HuNt0ce6fYnqdes27+H+ml1fnL0oRSkA6o/I=; b=fe01mk1BhF0O5ev1yz3CoB5dZbL0FJrGAzJDMJLdey34g+fXZzLOAEq8shMy0GtZK9 BwSerX0yWpoqUJtaAovD32PF50IBrCSmLG1cfrKn7Iyq249WycFosQq/GVqPLGIjlVuw UnrZ7RqWctfJLiRXDdjqPPBGnX8a8GyiBOjbP5xK2lhP1EL0kuj0ICnHJEXBeK9YT9KD 3zMgftkDPTMTr8VHHK/YZAR55Ny37TvfJiMAoiF3h4ylGBGj/c+SPdwWCL4t2cS6dpOJ 9rRdxpGzpFDtn7jqI9YhnDeN0+J57M2cUyoJfD/DCcSgV8zK2yPHTMdBuVTeTuEj9Uqm 5Rng== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=LYkatUZM; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id d10si12572003ejt.153.2020.08.18.00.02.44; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 00:03:08 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=LYkatUZM; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726759AbgHRG7d (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 18 Aug 2020 02:59:33 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com ([205.139.110.120]:58437 "EHLO us-smtp-1.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726273AbgHRG7b (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Aug 2020 02:59:31 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1597733969; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=37NUzz3HuNt0ce6fYnqdes27+H+ml1fnL0oRSkA6o/I=; b=LYkatUZMK9pl/18u6DAYkPKdWNhiw40SYY4wyscFcnGer6RZ88y5g/IJEbYef5/zCOJQmA mwTZUlTKVzJMbwS2Px0RRTgdtW8WNarqEx1joeumqTTcJyEIrAYZP+aqZtTU4AMAd8gZT0 ExDR2yGQKSkzcliW+vEymtr/GbozAVg= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-252-vAFKfDnoO7W9sBeXNpLEBA-1; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 02:59:25 -0400 X-MC-Unique: vAFKfDnoO7W9sBeXNpLEBA-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 78744425D3; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 06:59:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.36.113.93] (ovpn-113-93.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.113.93]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1855702F9; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 06:59:12 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 02/15] iommu: Report domain nesting info To: Jacob Pan Cc: "Liu, Yi L" , "alex.williamson@redhat.com" , "baolu.lu@linux.intel.com" , "joro@8bytes.org" , "Tian, Kevin" , "Raj, Ashok" , "Tian, Jun J" , "Sun, Yi Y" , "jean-philippe@linaro.org" , "peterx@redhat.com" , "Wu, Hao" , "stefanha@gmail.com" , "iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org" , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" References: <1595917664-33276-1-git-send-email-yi.l.liu@intel.com> <1595917664-33276-3-git-send-email-yi.l.liu@intel.com> <5c911565-c76a-c361-845e-56a91744d504@redhat.com> <342e8d77-1c1d-e637-0227-720ba67df8ba@redhat.com> <20200817212152.2820eedd@jacob-builder> From: Auger Eric Message-ID: <5b0fe5bb-26b3-a909-1bd9-4b5bcf62133b@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2020 08:59:11 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200817212152.2820eedd@jacob-builder> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.11 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Jacob, On 8/18/20 6:21 AM, Jacob Pan wrote: > On Sun, 16 Aug 2020 14:40:57 +0200 > Auger Eric wrote: > >> Hi Yi, >> >> On 8/14/20 9:15 AM, Liu, Yi L wrote: >>> Hi Eric, >>> >>>> From: Auger Eric >>>> Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2020 8:53 PM >>>> >>>> Yi, >>>> On 7/28/20 8:27 AM, Liu Yi L wrote: >>>>> IOMMUs that support nesting translation needs report the >>>>> capability info >>>> s/needs/need to >>>>> to userspace. It gives information about requirements the >>>>> userspace needs to implement plus other features characterizing >>>>> the physical implementation. >>>>> >>>>> This patch reports nesting info by DOMAIN_ATTR_NESTING. Caller >>>>> can get nesting info after setting DOMAIN_ATTR_NESTING. For VFIO, >>>>> it is after selecting VFIO_TYPE1_NESTING_IOMMU. >>>> This is not what this patch does ;-) It introduces a new IOMMU UAPI >>>> struct that gives information about the nesting capabilities and >>>> features. This struct is supposed to be returned by >>>> iommu_domain_get_attr() with DOMAIN_ATTR_NESTING attribute >>>> parameter, one a domain whose type has been set to >>>> DOMAIN_ATTR_NESTING. >>> >>> got it. let me apply your suggestion. thanks. :-) >>> >>>>> >>>>> Cc: Kevin Tian >>>>> CC: Jacob Pan >>>>> Cc: Alex Williamson >>>>> Cc: Eric Auger >>>>> Cc: Jean-Philippe Brucker >>>>> Cc: Joerg Roedel >>>>> Cc: Lu Baolu >>>>> Signed-off-by: Liu Yi L >>>>> Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan >>>>> --- >>>>> v5 -> v6: >>>>> *) rephrase the feature notes per comments from Eric Auger. >>>>> *) rename @size of struct iommu_nesting_info to @argsz. >>>>> >>>>> v4 -> v5: >>>>> *) address comments from Eric Auger. >>>>> >>>>> v3 -> v4: >>>>> *) split the SMMU driver changes to be a separate patch >>>>> *) move the @addr_width and @pasid_bits from vendor specific >>>>> part to generic part. >>>>> *) tweak the description for the @features field of struct >>>>> iommu_nesting_info. >>>>> *) add description on the @data[] field of struct >>>>> iommu_nesting_info >>>>> >>>>> v2 -> v3: >>>>> *) remvoe cap/ecap_mask in iommu_nesting_info. >>>>> *) reuse DOMAIN_ATTR_NESTING to get nesting info. >>>>> *) return an empty iommu_nesting_info for SMMU drivers per Jean' >>>>> suggestion. >>>>> --- >>>>> include/uapi/linux/iommu.h | 74 >>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>>> 1 file changed, 74 insertions(+) >>>>> >>>>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/iommu.h >>>>> b/include/uapi/linux/iommu.h index 7c8e075..5e4745a 100644 >>>>> --- a/include/uapi/linux/iommu.h >>>>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/iommu.h >>>>> @@ -332,4 +332,78 @@ struct iommu_gpasid_bind_data { >>>>> } vendor; >>>>> }; >>>>> >>>>> +/* >>>>> + * struct iommu_nesting_info - Information for nesting-capable >>>>> IOMMU. >>>>> + * userspace should check it >>>>> before using >>>>> + * nesting capability. >>>>> + * >>>>> + * @argsz: size of the whole structure. >>>>> + * @flags: currently reserved for future extension. must >>>>> set to 0. >>>>> + * @format: PASID table entry format, the same definition >>>>> as struct >>>>> + * iommu_gpasid_bind_data @format. >>>>> + * @features: supported nesting features. >>>>> + * @addr_width: The output addr width of first >>>>> level/stage translation >>>>> + * @pasid_bits: Maximum supported PASID bits, 0 >>>>> represents no PASID >>>>> + * support. >>>>> + * @data: vendor specific cap info. data[] structure type >>>>> can be deduced >>>>> + * from @format field. >>>>> + * >>>>> + * >>>> +===============+=================================================== >>>> ===+ >>>>> + * | feature | >>>>> Notes | >>>>> + * >>>> +===============+=================================================== >>>> ===+ >>>>> + * | SYSWIDE_PASID | IOMMU vendor driver sets it to mandate >>>>> userspace | >>>>> + * | | to allocate PASID from kernel. All PASID >>>>> allocation | >>>>> + * | | free must be mediated through the TBD >>>>> API. | >>>> s/TBD/IOMMU >>> >>> got it. >>> >>>>> + * >>>>> +---------------+------------------------------------------------------+ >>>>> + * | BIND_PGTBL | IOMMU vendor driver sets it to mandate >>>>> userspace | >>>>> + * | | bind the first level/stage page table to >>>>> associated | >>>> s/bind/to bind >>> >>> got it. >>> >>>>> + * | | PASID (either the one specified in bind >>>>> request or | >>>>> + * | | the default PASID of iommu domain), >>>>> through IOMMU | >>>>> + * | | >>>>> UAPI. | >>>>> + * >>>>> +---------------+------------------------------------------------------+ >>>>> + * | CACHE_INVLD | IOMMU vendor driver sets it to mandate >>>>> userspace | >>>> >>>>> + * | | explicitly invalidate the IOMMU cache >>>>> through IOMMU | >>>> to explicitly >>> >>> I see. >>> >>>>> + * | | U >>>>> API according to vendor-specific requirement when | >>>>> + * | | changing the 1st level/stage page >>>>> table. | >>>>> + * >>>>> +---------------+------------------------------------------------------+ >>>>> + * >>>>> + * @data[] types defined for @format: >>>>> + * >>>> +================================+================================== >>>> ===+ >>>>> + * | @format | >>>>> @data[] | >>>>> + * >>>> +================================+================================== >>>> ===+ >>>>> + * | IOMMU_PASID_FORMAT_INTEL_VTD | struct >>>>> iommu_nesting_info_vtd | >>>>> + * >>>>> +--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+ >>>>> + * >>>>> + */ >>>>> +struct iommu_nesting_info { >>>>> + __u32 argsz; >>>>> + __u32 flags; >>>>> + __u32 format; >>>>> +#define IOMMU_NESTING_FEAT_SYSWIDE_PASID (1 << 0) >>>>> +#define IOMMU_NESTING_FEAT_BIND_PGTBL (1 << 1) >>>>> +#define IOMMU_NESTING_FEAT_CACHE_INVLD (1 << 2) >>>>> + __u32 features; >>>>> + __u16 addr_width; >>>>> + __u16 pasid_bits; >>>>> + __u32 padding; >>>>> + __u8 data[]; >>>>> +}; >>>> As opposed to other IOMMU UAPI structs there is no union member at >>>> the end. >>> >>> nice catch. do you think it would be better to adding a union and >>> put the struct iommu_nesting_info_vtd in it? >> Yes I think so. At least it would be consistent with the rest of the >> API and with the guidelines. >>> >>>> Also this struct is not documented in [PATCH v7 1/7] docs: IOMMU >>>> user API. Shouldn't we align. >>>> You may also consider to move this patch in Jacob's series for >>>> consistency, thoughts? >>> >>> this was talked one time between Jacob and me. It was put in this >>> series as the major user of nesting_info is in this series. e.g. >>> vfio checks the SYSWIDE_PASID. but I'm open to merge it with Jacob's >>> series if it would make the merge easier. >> Yep I think it would make sense to move in Jacob's series to have a >> general understanding of the uapi >> > I a little reluctant to include this in my UAPI set, the reason is that > there are two dimensions IOMMU UAPI are extended: > 1. Define the protocols in interaction with VFIO, sanity checking, and > backward compatibility. > 2. Adding more UAPI data structures that are parallel to the existing > ones. > > My patchset is to address #1, this patch is for #2. My thinking is that > once we have reached consensus on #1, new UAPI structures such as this > patch can just follow the suit. > > If that is OK with you, I would like to keep them separate to avoid > diverging conversations. OK no problem for me, as long as the new APIs follow the rules & guidelines introduced in your series. Thanks Eric > > Thanks, > > Jacob > >> Thanks >> >> Eric >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Yi Liu >>> >>>>> + >>>>> +/* >>>>> + * struct iommu_nesting_info_vtd - Intel VT-d specific nesting >>>>> info. >>>>> + * >>>>> + * @flags: VT-d specific flags. Currently reserved for >>>>> future >>>>> + * extension. must be set to 0. >>>>> + * @cap_reg: Describe basic capabilities as defined in >>>>> VT-d capability >>>>> + * register. >>>>> + * @ecap_reg: Describe the extended capabilities as >>>>> defined in VT-d >>>>> + * extended capability register. >>>>> + */ >>>>> +struct iommu_nesting_info_vtd { >>>>> + __u32 flags; >>>>> + __u32 padding; >>>>> + __u64 cap_reg; >>>>> + __u64 ecap_reg; >>>>> +}; >>>>> + >>>>> #endif /* _UAPI_IOMMU_H */ >>>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> >>>> Eric >>>> >>> >> > > [Jacob Pan] >