Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Tue, 18 Aug 2020 13:19:20 +0530
From:   Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:     Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc:     David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Michal Such?nek <msuchanek@suse.de>,
        Gautham R Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
        Satheesh Rajendran <sathnaga@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
        "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>,
        linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Christopher Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
        Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
        "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] mm/page_alloc: Keep memoryless cpuless node 0
 offline
Message-ID: <20200818074920.GA3698@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reply-To: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
References: <12945273-d788-710d-e8d7-974966529c7d@redhat.com>
 <20200701122110.GT2369@dhcp22.suse.cz>
 <20200703091001.GJ21462@kitsune.suse.cz>
 <20200703092414.GR18446@dhcp22.suse.cz>
 <20200703105944.GS18446@dhcp22.suse.cz>
 <20200703125823.GA26243@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
 <20200806213211.6a6a56037fe771836e5abbe9@linux-foundation.org>
 <20200812060101.GB10992@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
 <13a85e52-5caa-24a8-7169-3992b1ad262a@redhat.com>
 <20200818073712.GK28270@dhcp22.suse.cz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200818073712.GK28270@dhcp22.suse.cz>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

* Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> [2020-08-18 09:37:12]:

> On Tue 18-08-20 09:32:52, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> > On 12.08.20 08:01, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> > > Hi Andrew, Michal, David
> > > 
> > > * Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> [2020-08-06 21:32:11]:
> > > 
> > >> On Fri, 3 Jul 2020 18:28:23 +0530 Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>>> The memory hotplug changes that somehow because you can hotremove numa
> > >>>> nodes and therefore make the nodemask sparse but that is not a common
> > >>>> case. I am not sure what would happen if a completely new node was added
> > >>>> and its corresponding node was already used by the renumbered one
> > >>>> though. It would likely conflate the two I am afraid. But I am not sure
> > >>>> this is really possible with x86 and a lack of a bug report would
> > >>>> suggest that nobody is doing that at least.
> > >>>>
> > >> So...  do we merge this patch or not?  Seems that the overall view is
> > >> "risky but nobody is likely to do anything better any time soon"?
> > > 
> > > Can we decide on this one way or the other?
> > 
> > Hmm, not sure who's the person to decide. I tend to prefer doing the
> > node renaming, handling this in ppc code;
> 
> Agreed. That would be a safer option.

Okay, will send arch specific v6 version.

> -- 
> Michal Hocko
> SUSE Labs

-- 
Thanks and Regards
Srikar Dronamraju