From: Ingo Oeser <ioe-lkml@rameria.de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: [patchset] Generic IRQ Subsystem: -V4
Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 00:24:52 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
       Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
       Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
       Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
References: <20060517001310.GA12877@elte.hu> <20060517221536.GA13444@elte.hu>
In-Reply-To: <20060517221536.GA13444@elte.hu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200605190024.53879.ioe-lkml@rameria.de>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 629
Lines: 23

Hi Ingo,

just a minor nit.

On Thursday, 18. May 2006 00:15, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> - sem2mutex: kernel/irq/autoprobe.c probe_sem => probe_lock mutex 
>   conversion.

Please call this probe_mutex. probe_lock would suggest, 
that this is a spin_lock() when people talk about it.

Didn't look at the actual patch, so maybe you just have a bug
in this list here :-)


Regards

Ingo Oeser
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/