Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:a0d1:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp2938884pxa; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 02:02:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzZvLvVojBH8LCOrcNDfr6zL68aWsWWRLXFPMISyfuhwV8cFFi17GilcKB327CNnMjXyj8f X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:2296:: with SMTP id p22mr18910991eja.510.1597741320010; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 02:02:00 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1597741320; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=oap9f943WwGu/7N3pUEeZXocmr+LEWKukhJhSb/jdpsSTJvAthIdT2X+LIKsBWv1Mi S8qqqv6Ek+UA6uwRXdBRdaLSfGlUPbU6Bxi59yxwXsReYf6CAaLpH+HExctYeMJFjZ+n XsayY7bJT0y35GkvWIRVxHrg90yQNX1/Kmyv8ZTHYt4b+HfQNQrcZ8VnjH25IVilt9QC gqPuxl32XBkphkiFHYmIh7kPFn28ANAXLt4W8LaVG6lpxBva4Q5Sonkl8R+u+6a9nzML 2zo7YP2IqIW1UiT+AhA1Iaits7kzNHqul2TqCsCGk5kZl+wszsD4qs0u0211TcNWp34D N+qg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :dkim-signature; bh=LwYlioqpHS/gmxgOcffqAwVxuvHCLYruQxEepn5wr38=; b=0ZOF68As7zEZdlJzIeKAykdlg5HlWuCNMw816WPlXdA2OBPUQqKFAvqsVOdSh3X/UW HpTQ5ztHyEjKSYJMxJvSb7mPNu/CEdlr0r2qmEUGaxckcfTadj8keBmxBanWVZj9hLAH Wd8IZWEzNjLpq8Qz6bDNrTowhuT7fa2h+9ND5V8JuhUDCf15tDpLnVjvv6BFyqEkzsoj Lvv7toEG85BAtod8FiVAdV6nJfGaRy8R9z2aynFU24jylGVG3kq9M4cVoBsGoXNFVw0o T+liPLKH0t9+8lURPpggwThkUoAUB3oGV657we1i4juoWP9Tu8Eju+fae6ShPZsVXt1B 492Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=brekEtiu; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id i22si12900359ejf.220.2020.08.18.02.01.36; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 02:01:59 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=brekEtiu; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726366AbgHRJBD (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 18 Aug 2020 05:01:03 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com ([205.139.110.120]:32250 "EHLO us-smtp-1.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726353AbgHRJBC (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Aug 2020 05:01:02 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1597741261; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=LwYlioqpHS/gmxgOcffqAwVxuvHCLYruQxEepn5wr38=; b=brekEtiubhn089zUnXdUhyElBn+swpGj+xb4HJIPMUZa9I33U2xhMMriwzAifF7n9Bv/zB afT3VylL3J4nVI+7x+qLw4qKiBhjvV2m4xg9/KgdDqmp0rPZ6PZQWdQVDhYYhWBF0y38IL I5CKNfXtF5WKK5wQ0r2wXsjat3G0ho4= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-132-mlrecaKvN2iRk-aKQOmtPQ-1; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 05:00:57 -0400 X-MC-Unique: mlrecaKvN2iRk-aKQOmtPQ-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5813A0BC2; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 09:00:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sirius.home.kraxel.org (ovpn-112-195.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.112.195]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFEDA5D9D2; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 09:00:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by sirius.home.kraxel.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 078151753B; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 11:00:49 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2020 11:00:49 +0200 From: Gerd Hoffmann To: Christian =?utf-8?B?S8O2bmln?= Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, David Airlie , "open list:DRM DRIVER FOR NVIDIA GEFORCE/QUADRO GPUS" , Sandy Huang , Thierry Reding , Oleksandr Andrushchenko , "open list:RADEON and AMDGPU DRM DRIVERS" , Jonathan Hunter , "open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC support" , Ben Skeggs , Russell King , "moderated list:DRM DRIVERS FOR XEN" , "open list:DRM DRIVER FOR MSM ADRENO GPU" , "moderated list:DRM DRIVERS FOR VIVANTE GPU IP" , "open list:DRM DRIVERS FOR NVIDIA TEGRA" , Sean Paul , "moderated list:ARM/Rockchip SoC support" , open list , Thomas Zimmermann , Alex Deucher , "open list:DRM DRIVER FOR MSM ADRENO GPU" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm: allow limiting the scatter list size. Message-ID: <20200818090049.qomgyyw6hif4cmah@sirius.home.kraxel.org> References: <20200818074828.9509-1-kraxel@redhat.com> <20200818074828.9509-2-kraxel@redhat.com> <9c355d64-1a61-eb59-be80-d9fc863ddf22@amd.com> <20200818082703.7z6fcvoymiqow5kw@sirius.home.kraxel.org> <03c03129-db27-c6da-df8f-909141d2a3f7@amd.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <03c03129-db27-c6da-df8f-909141d2a3f7@amd.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.14 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, > > > I'm missing an explanation why this should be useful (it certainly is). > > virtio-gpu needs this to work properly with SEV (see patch 2/2 of this > > series). > > Yeah, that's the problem patch 2/2 never showed up here :) The list should have everything. Your inbox probably has 1/2 only because 2/2 doesn't touch amd code and 'git send-email' evaluates sendemail.cccmd (pointing to get_maintainer.pl) for each patch individually. I've found this behavior confusing at times before. Is there some way to send the whole series to everybody? Or at least the cover letter? The git-send-email manpage doesn't give a clue :( > > Placing it in drm_device instead would indeed work for virtio-gpu, so I > > guess you are suggesting that instead? > > That is probably the best approach, yes. Ok, I'll go that route then. thanks, Gerd