Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Tue, 18 Aug 2020 11:26:17 +0200
From:   Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
To:     peterz@infradead.org
Cc:     Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
        Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
        Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/8] memcg: Enable fine-grained per process memory
 control
Message-ID: <20200818092617.GN28270@dhcp22.suse.cz>
References: <20200817140831.30260-1-longman@redhat.com>
 <20200818091453.GL2674@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200818091453.GL2674@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue 18-08-20 11:14:53, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 10:08:23AM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> > Memory controller can be used to control and limit the amount of
> > physical memory used by a task. When a limit is set in "memory.high" in
> > a v2 non-root memory cgroup, the memory controller will try to reclaim
> > memory if the limit has been exceeded. Normally, that will be enough
> > to keep the physical memory consumption of tasks in the memory cgroup
> > to be around or below the "memory.high" limit.
> > 
> > Sometimes, memory reclaim may not be able to recover memory in a rate
> > that can catch up to the physical memory allocation rate. In this case,
> > the physical memory consumption will keep on increasing. 
> 
> Then slow down the allocator? That's what we do for dirty pages too, we
> slow down the dirtier when we run against the limits.

This is what we actually do. Have a look at mem_cgroup_handle_over_high.

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs