Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:a0d1:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp2976429pxa; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 03:15:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJze6qopJDejwhGTzhrv+XK0eDui5P4JC6049ov8ik4E8qUp4+SC2OO8BDJrDzJowGwMFczN X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:bcf4:: with SMTP id op20mr20190081ejb.277.1597745720906; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 03:15:20 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1597745720; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=X/gTIyo7lrZ6Wo/n2dhcUuuCEYdMHDU6dHL0YFVolGQOJrjxS/uLZlgqtVUV1s3ulN zte7NjEVVKTNmFNQGfIoaRZXAc8SAWkI/Kh8RZ2d7vsrRUlITjhCrqmwJZJLW7h+ob7u LWqho7bgivN8RnXfRmEuG8r0+4YrSq2jcfAyMkmoDOkNI6F6+vg0ysXCQHCZb48XfZII ut2R/EprZjT7pO8Vu8IdUvemByts7htXtkImosQ0yW7ntjq564IBLqsj8CW+/LJATFH/ uwKAZOuWL+hX0Ir4+yJf4RypAQ+YsqNWGRTeB4Sq94N+o3vcUYmDOUe7aUNT3eQocVdD C/+g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:organization:from:references:cc:to:subject; bh=/T3n9U6pGJgi95j7vseotSqjTZCrcT7qyaR6EbZPCdE=; b=M1cvkG2zpCzzGqGKYTuTTnu+UdBFehRmpwrPu09bgRKKMWOiU9X/wKjdHfGT/whGNq Wjye/kXLR6lzItgUWMHidCX+0IdyYbccotl3pduWLNTxqCDzZZQAOCsfczDsp3XgHAsf 7fxeZbr1oD9ISd2MHaS5xLSAHgWTK/hTqbgSAMTu7KuNpX0cJ+m+yVQ+0iurhGNy2A3k 0GBBmO51q39j1Q6JLeWyJQVmtDHMTjH3xiqdTHJrwzdjGlD/MQXX0oQaLvSEUIBUgyyg xxNBxJeeXrd3g4euGmY4ab8Zrc3ZuLuCrUTrnTDbcKTn5nRQPahDnTG4VANQjSiJWaov Clwg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id s23si12974696edy.158.2020.08.18.03.14.56; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 03:15:20 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726639AbgHRKMZ (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 18 Aug 2020 06:12:25 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:50628 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726353AbgHRKMX (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Aug 2020 06:12:23 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.221.27]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BD06AF8E; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 10:12:48 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/9] dt-bindings: pinctrl: realtek: Add Realtek DHC SoC rtd1295 To: Rob Herring , TY Chang Cc: linux-realtek-soc@lists.infradead.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, linus.walleij@linaro.org References: <20200813074908.889-1-tychang@realtek.com> <20200813074908.889-6-tychang@realtek.com> <20200817203358.GA1508879@bogus> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Andreas_F=c3=a4rber?= Organization: SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH Message-ID: <012eee35-6835-7244-0013-9fc6980107e0@suse.de> Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2020 12:12:21 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200817203358.GA1508879@bogus> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Am 17.08.20 um 22:33 schrieb Rob Herring: > On Thu, 13 Aug 2020 15:49:04 +0800, TY Chang wrote: >> Add device tree binding Documentation for rtd1295 >> pinctrl driver. >> >> Signed-off-by: TY Chang >> --- >> .../pinctrl/realtek,rtd1295-pinctrl.yaml | 192 ++++++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 192 insertions(+) >> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/realtek,rtd1295-pinctrl.yaml >> > > > Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However, > there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream > maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply. > > If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed. The thing really missing here is a per-patch change log. Things were added here that I'm sure you would not give your Reviewed-by for, in particular new properties prefixed with unregistered rtk prefix instead of the registered realtek prefix. @TY, hiding such changes in a big previously reviewed patch without any mention is problematic - please rather do smaller follow-up patches to not invalidate previous reviews with new features. Thanks, Andreas -- SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Felix Imendörffer HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg)