Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] nvme: add emulation for zone-append
To:     Javier Gonzalez <javier@javigon.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc:     axboe@kernel.dk, Damien.LeMoal@wdc.com,
        SelvaKumar S <selvakuma.s1@samsung.com>, sagi@grimberg.me,
        Kanchan Joshi <joshi.k@samsung.com>,
        johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, kbusch@kernel.org,
        Nitesh Shetty <nj.shetty@samsung.com>
References: <20200818052936.10995-1-joshi.k@samsung.com>
 <CGME20200818053256epcas5p46d0b66b3702192eb6617c8bba334c15f@epcas5p4.samsung.com>
 <20200818052936.10995-3-joshi.k@samsung.com> <20200818071249.GB2544@lst.de>
 <20200818095033.h6ybdwiq3ljagl5a@mpHalley.local>
From:   =?UTF-8?Q?Matias_Bj=c3=b8rling?= <mb@lightnvm.io>
Message-ID: <4ae89443-d8ae-4efb-581e-b635c21b27de@lightnvm.io>
Date:   Tue, 18 Aug 2020 12:51:37 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:60.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20200818095033.h6ybdwiq3ljagl5a@mpHalley.local>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 18/08/2020 11.50, Javier Gonzalez wrote:
> On 18.08.2020 09:12, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 10:59:36AM +0530, Kanchan Joshi wrote:
>>> If drive does not support zone-append natively, enable emulation using
>>> regular write.
>>> Make emulated zone-append cmd write-lock the zone, preventing
>>> concurrent append/write on the same zone.
>>
>> I really don't think we should add this.  ZNS and the Linux support
>> were all designed with Zone Append in mind, and then your company did
>> the nastiest possible move violating the normal NVMe procedures to make
>> it optional.  But that doesn't change the fact the Linux should keep
>> requiring it, especially with the amount of code added here and how it
>> hooks in the fast path.
> 
> I understand that the NVMe process was agitated and that the current ZNS
> implementation in Linux relies in append support from the device
> perspective. However, the current TP does allow for not implementing
> append, and a number of customers are requiring the use of normal
> writes, which we want to support.

There is a lot of things that is specified in NVMe, but not implemented 
in the Linux kernel. That your company is not able to efficiently 
implement the Zone Append command (this is the only reason I can think 
of that make you and your company cause such a fuss), shouldn't mean 
that everyone else has to suffer.

In any case, SPDK offers adequate support and can be used today.