Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] pinctrl: mcp23s08: Fixups for mcp23x17
To:     Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Cc:     linus.walleij@linaro.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <20200814100357.209340-1-thomas.preston@codethink.co.uk>
 <26d33248-c07b-db2c-2989-3ca14aea7896@codethink.co.uk>
 <20200817192957.GA1401599@bogus>
From:   Thomas Preston <thomas.preston@codethink.co.uk>
Message-ID: <13c56cdc-ecb4-6590-7233-887397f1cd97@codethink.co.uk>
Date:   Tue, 18 Aug 2020 12:09:10 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20200817192957.GA1401599@bogus>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 17/08/2020 20:29, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 02:56:54PM +0100, Thomas Preston wrote:
>> Actually I think I'm wrong about the interrupt-controller changes in patches
>> 0002 and 0003.
> 
> You are. Looking at the datasheet, the GPIOs have interrupt capability.
> GPIO controllers are typically both an interrupt client and provider.

Thanks for the clarification.

I still think the patch 0001 is required. The precious and volatile 
ranges are broken.