Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932343AbWESPOf (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 May 2006 11:14:35 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932338AbWESPOf (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 May 2006 11:14:35 -0400 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:62652 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932344AbWESPOc (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 May 2006 11:14:32 -0400 Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 08:13:34 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Herbert Poetzl Cc: serue@us.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dev@sw.ru, devel@openvz.org, sam@vilain.net, ebiederm@xmission.com, xemul@sw.ru, haveblue@us.ibm.com, clg@fr.ibm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] namespaces: Introduction Message-Id: <20060519081334.06ce452d.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20060519124235.GA32304@MAIL.13thfloor.at> References: <20060518154700.GA28344@sergelap.austin.ibm.com> <20060518103430.080e3523.akpm@osdl.org> <20060519124235.GA32304@MAIL.13thfloor.at> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1459 Lines: 42 Herbert Poetzl wrote: > > let me > give a simple example here: Examples are useful. > "pid virtualization" > > - Linux-VServer doesn't really need that right now. > we are perfectly fine with "pid isolation" here, we > only "virtualize" the init pid to make pstree happy > > - Snapshot/Restart and Migration will require "full" > pid virtualization (that's where Eric and OpenVZ > are heading towards) snapshot/restart/migration worry me. If they require complete serialisation of complex kernel data structures then we have a problem, because it means that any time anyone changes such a structure they need to update (and test) the serialisation. This may be a show-stopper, in which case maybe we only need to virtualise pid #1. > - OpenSSI and *Mosix require system wide pid spaces > which probably could be implemented with virtual > pid spaces as well > > - many security addons provide something called pid > randomization, and I think they could probably > benefit from a virtual pid space, too ok. Anyway. Thanks, guys. It sound like most of this work will be nicely separable so we can think about each bit as it comes along. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/