Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20200729192357.477350-1-vitor@massaru.org>
In-Reply-To: <20200729192357.477350-1-vitor@massaru.org>
From:   Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Date:   Wed, 19 Aug 2020 14:14:42 -0700
Message-ID: <CAFd5g45rRMDD8=wQOzh+cGHEM4WJ=4vSu44W+4yPCFNFM2SB9A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lib: kunit: add list_sort test conversion to KUnit
To:     Vitor Massaru Iha <vitor@massaru.org>
Cc:     KUnit Development <kunit-dev@googlegroups.com>,
        "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" 
        <linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
        linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org,
        Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
        Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, elfring@users.sourceforge.net,
        mhocko@suse.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 12:24 PM Vitor Massaru Iha <vitor@massaru.org> wrote:
>
> This adds the conversion of the runtime tests of test_list_sort,
> from `lib/test_list_sort.c` to KUnit tests.
>
> Please apply this commit first (linux-kselftest/kunit-fixes):
> 3f37d14b8a3152441f36b6bc74000996679f0998 kunit: kunit_config: Fix parsing of CONFIG options with space
>
> Code Style Documentation: [0]
>
> Signed-off-by: Vitor Massaru Iha <vitor@massaru.org>
> Link: [0] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20200620054944.167330-1-davidgow@google.com/T/#u

Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>

It would still be good to get some of the original authors/reviewers
to review this.