Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964818AbWESUYf (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 May 2006 16:24:35 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964819AbWESUYf (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 May 2006 16:24:35 -0400 Received: from jacks.isp2dial.com ([64.142.120.55]:13828 "EHLO jacks.isp2dial.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964818AbWESUYf (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 May 2006 16:24:35 -0400 From: John Kelly To: John Kelly Cc: "Hua Zhong" , "'Eric W. Biederman'" , "'Andrew Morton'" , "'Herbert Poetzl'" , , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] namespaces: Introduction Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 16:23:43 -0400 Message-ID: <200605192023.k4JKNgao012742@isp2dial.com> References: <008201c67b71$fb938db0$493d010a@nuitysystems.com> <200605191945.k4JJjguK012606@isp2dial.com> In-Reply-To: <200605191945.k4JJjguK012606@isp2dial.com> X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Hard2Crack: 0.001 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 621 Lines: 18 On Fri, 19 May 2006 15:45:43 -0400, John Kelly wrote: >If the VM approach is truly less risky, seems to me the Xen/VMware >developers should be able to succeed independently, despite changes >made for in-kernel virtualization. OTOH, maybe the Xen and VMware developers will kill each other off, and then we won't have to worry about Xen, or VMware. ;-) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/