Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        stable@vger.kernel.org,
        Charles Stanhope <charles.stanhope@gmail.com>,
        Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@analog.com>,
        Stable@vger.kernel.org,
        Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5.8 045/232] iio: dac: ad5592r: fix unbalanced mutex unlocks in ad5592r_read_raw()
Date:   Thu, 20 Aug 2020 11:18:16 +0200
Message-Id: <20200820091614.962747060@linuxfoundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <20200820091612.692383444@linuxfoundation.org>
References: <20200820091612.692383444@linuxfoundation.org>
User-Agent: quilt/0.66
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

From: Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@analog.com>

commit 65afb0932a81c1de719ceee0db0b276094b10ac8 upstream.

There are 2 exit paths where the lock isn't held, but try to unlock the
mutex when exiting. In these places we should just return from the
function.

A neater approach would be to cleanup the ad5592r_read_raw(), but that
would make this patch more difficult to backport to stable versions.

Fixes 56ca9db862bf3: ("iio: dac: Add support for the AD5592R/AD5593R ADCs/DACs")
Reported-by: Charles Stanhope <charles.stanhope@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@analog.com>
Cc: <Stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/iio/dac/ad5592r-base.c |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/iio/dac/ad5592r-base.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/dac/ad5592r-base.c
@@ -413,7 +413,7 @@ static int ad5592r_read_raw(struct iio_d
 			s64 tmp = *val * (3767897513LL / 25LL);
 			*val = div_s64_rem(tmp, 1000000000LL, val2);
 
-			ret = IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_MICRO;
+			return IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_MICRO;
 		} else {
 			int mult;
 
@@ -444,7 +444,7 @@ static int ad5592r_read_raw(struct iio_d
 		ret =  IIO_VAL_INT;
 		break;
 	default:
-		ret = -EINVAL;
+		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
 unlock: