Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:a0d1:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp1568174pxa; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 14:56:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzUqxpVYbROG0BOd4FHWcY0ZhF6Xcxe0pnmpM4SON40fef+TTQHJEDJSzsbADe+vrTLTdDG X-Received: by 2002:a50:a69a:: with SMTP id e26mr633201edc.260.1597960575393; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 14:56:15 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1597960575; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=q/qH0Ur4eR5Z2nGC7lh7rcNNqW0VIn6clZoK+ElL1YdsJWWR3YOheqL8hUq5ZZ+vqg nQkpLEI/C+YsUdrZCVlS5vmQ362juy/6ycaxLsus8b4GpEcm3uB0QgQFzDmyJnD3bU3R N6AhaSvUEytq5QVOwi3ty6xGA7TI6pGn8IXSgtGWoS21GJsl7ScafDbbMFCtMf+Oa4TH ClyLDZF5LfEFf8ueE23gh2kKy/OFQXB5EzQn8N0gFHDugNY+qxzEmUqzbVOGsnVqlx+1 Ow5ioMnSB8erbU3ue+wVeMjYCI7dVxehjGyGzrcdi0zPYdINrgwW8L/cRaogkcCyKXqz mKjQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-language :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:organization:from:references:cc:to:subject :dkim-signature; bh=bqTEDMhBKHUNdE/xOyKTnipumO1ldzx6XH3nmOiyvQQ=; b=ON3xw7wKVqfZ4UbZvc4r+O37TgKnvwTGcWVgSqRRs4MBlHZl84WUNHxoDqroTrurls BjI7zaBwwgK2KEi+SAdMZfx7EP+bT7CV/KsGlQA+FK7pLwrF3g6VbG3gk+YXAQ4ynnyO e+ycG+USAOglorpkee3SypxkfUYZQjzH3JqcEpnNRI+yviIUJaxYEfHZb9lWOeAcomDw GL54K/Xh2fzgtGsttu9W/i+3FgPqNo74EI06Gx0V7ThW7woELDkXmalKHwn52cHskp3t oKjAUK7RlU2Z/lahzmoBKWWcEo4aJo1yg4lA4KrsdvIsPBpyMrh5vgspIk555/FjjBuj Rpkw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=UqoHrxDC; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id o3si2002294ejm.346.2020.08.20.14.55.51; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 14:56:15 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=UqoHrxDC; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728353AbgHTU3h (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 20 Aug 2020 16:29:37 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([63.128.21.124]:38971 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726908AbgHTU3h (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Aug 2020 16:29:37 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1597955375; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=bqTEDMhBKHUNdE/xOyKTnipumO1ldzx6XH3nmOiyvQQ=; b=UqoHrxDCUmVGNuNcjX3y5BjoF2tgaUImBNGrCwRDViVBs1s+5iIBRSrF/O1JyDobx4q+jy mWDSWtxy/fxtSQQ5ceNPpEYMhtSphwX0pWk+VxmYfbJa1fQRChKqY6UEQmdBcveqGtVYVK MR5QQexJ+YsFvOghE+dWdSRs9Mg43Yo= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-274-EUGSS4-LNaCluMQg0kLEHw-1; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 16:29:31 -0400 X-MC-Unique: EUGSS4-LNaCluMQg0kLEHw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B0CF364080; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 20:29:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from llong.remote.csb (unknown [10.10.115.249]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE10039A55; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 20:29:27 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] mm/memcg: Simplify mem_cgroup_get_max() To: Johannes Weiner Cc: Michal Hocko , Vladimir Davydov , Andrew Morton , Tejun Heo , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Shakeel Butt , Chris Down , Roman Gushchin , Yafang Shao References: <20200820130350.3211-1-longman@redhat.com> <20200820130350.3211-3-longman@redhat.com> <20200820173546.GB912520@cmpxchg.org> From: Waiman Long Organization: Red Hat Message-ID: Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2020 16:29:27 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200820173546.GB912520@cmpxchg.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.11 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 8/20/20 1:35 PM, Johannes Weiner wrote: > On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 09:03:49AM -0400, Waiman Long wrote: >> The mem_cgroup_get_max() function used to get memory+swap max from >> both the v1 memsw and v2 memory+swap page counters & return the maximum >> of these 2 values. This is redundant and it is more efficient to just >> get either the v1 or the v2 values depending on which one is currently >> in use. >> >> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long >> --- >> mm/memcontrol.c | 14 +++++--------- >> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c >> index 26b7a48d3afb..d219dca5239f 100644 >> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c >> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c >> @@ -1633,17 +1633,13 @@ void mem_cgroup_print_oom_meminfo(struct mem_cgroup *memcg) >> */ >> unsigned long mem_cgroup_get_max(struct mem_cgroup *memcg) >> { >> - unsigned long max; >> + unsigned long max = READ_ONCE(memcg->memory.max); >> >> - max = READ_ONCE(memcg->memory.max); >> if (mem_cgroup_swappiness(memcg)) { >> - unsigned long memsw_max; >> - unsigned long swap_max; >> - >> - memsw_max = memcg->memsw.max; >> - swap_max = READ_ONCE(memcg->swap.max); >> - swap_max = min(swap_max, (unsigned long)total_swap_pages); >> - max = min(max + swap_max, memsw_max); >> + if (cgroup_subsys_on_dfl(memory_cgrp_subsys)) >> + max += READ_ONCE(memcg->swap.max); >> + else >> + max = memcg->memsw.max; > I agree with the premise of the patch, but v1 and v2 have sufficiently > different logic, and the way v1 overrides max from the innermost > branch again also doesn't help in understanding what's going on. > > Can you please split out the v1 and v2 code? > > if (cgroup_subsys_on_dfl(memory_cgrp_subsys)) { > max = READ_ONCE(memcg->memory.max); > if (mem_cgroup_swappiness(memcg)) > max += READ_ONCE(memcg->swap.max); > } else { > if (mem_cgroup_swappiness(memcg)) > max = memcg->memsw.max; > else > max = READ_ONCE(memcg->memory.max); > } > > It's slightly repetitive, but IMO much more readable. > Sure. That makes it even better. Cheers, Longman