Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20200820130350.3211-1-longman@redhat.com> <20200820130350.3211-3-longman@redhat.com>
 <20200820173546.GB912520@cmpxchg.org> <a3d4783b-5aee-da40-06c0-ac63e292ccdb@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <a3d4783b-5aee-da40-06c0-ac63e292ccdb@redhat.com>
From:   Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Date:   Thu, 20 Aug 2020 14:25:41 -0700
Message-ID: <CALvZod6GARMuO8YzMp-1FZaasSZJ8t2b9dUu5tXUcDeuHxA6KA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] mm/memcg: Simplify mem_cgroup_get_max()
To:     Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Cc:     Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
        Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Cgroups <cgroups@vger.kernel.org>, Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
        Chris Down <chris@chrisdown.name>,
        Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>,
        Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 1:29 PM Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On 8/20/20 1:35 PM, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 09:03:49AM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> >> The mem_cgroup_get_max() function used to get memory+swap max from
> >> both the v1 memsw and v2 memory+swap page counters & return the maximum
> >> of these 2 values. This is redundant and it is more efficient to just
> >> get either the v1 or the v2 values depending on which one is currently
> >> in use.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
> >> ---
> >>   mm/memcontrol.c | 14 +++++---------
> >>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> >> index 26b7a48d3afb..d219dca5239f 100644
> >> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> >> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> >> @@ -1633,17 +1633,13 @@ void mem_cgroup_print_oom_meminfo(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> >>    */
> >>   unsigned long mem_cgroup_get_max(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> >>   {
> >> -    unsigned long max;
> >> +    unsigned long max = READ_ONCE(memcg->memory.max);
> >>
> >> -    max = READ_ONCE(memcg->memory.max);
> >>      if (mem_cgroup_swappiness(memcg)) {
> >> -            unsigned long memsw_max;
> >> -            unsigned long swap_max;
> >> -
> >> -            memsw_max = memcg->memsw.max;
> >> -            swap_max = READ_ONCE(memcg->swap.max);
> >> -            swap_max = min(swap_max, (unsigned long)total_swap_pages);
> >> -            max = min(max + swap_max, memsw_max);
> >> +            if (cgroup_subsys_on_dfl(memory_cgrp_subsys))
> >> +                    max += READ_ONCE(memcg->swap.max);
> >> +            else
> >> +                    max = memcg->memsw.max;
> > I agree with the premise of the patch, but v1 and v2 have sufficiently
> > different logic, and the way v1 overrides max from the innermost
> > branch again also doesn't help in understanding what's going on.
> >
> > Can you please split out the v1 and v2 code?
> >
> >       if (cgroup_subsys_on_dfl(memory_cgrp_subsys)) {
> >               max = READ_ONCE(memcg->memory.max);
> >               if (mem_cgroup_swappiness(memcg))
> >                       max += READ_ONCE(memcg->swap.max);
> >       } else {
> >               if (mem_cgroup_swappiness(memcg))
> >                       max = memcg->memsw.max;
> >               else
> >                       max = READ_ONCE(memcg->memory.max);
> >       }
> >
> > It's slightly repetitive, but IMO much more readable.
> >
> Sure. That makes it even better.
>

Can you please also add in the commit message why it is ok to drop
total_swap_pages comparison from mem_cgroup_get_max()?