Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] block: use DEFINE_WAIT_BIT instead of DEFINE_WAIT for
 bit wait queue
From:   Jacob Wen <jian.w.wen@oracle.com>
To:     linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-block@vger.kernel.org
References: <20200813050552.26856-1-jian.w.wen@oracle.com>
Message-ID: <3eff2c13-640e-6686-9a79-70c97e9fdfa5@oracle.com>
Date:   Fri, 21 Aug 2020 09:32:10 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20200813050552.26856-1-jian.w.wen@oracle.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Can I have a review?

On 8/13/20 1:05 PM, Jacob Wen wrote:
> DEFINE_WAIT_BIT uses wake_bit_function() which is able to avoid
> false-wakeups due to possible hash collisions in the bit wait table.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jacob Wen <jian.w.wen@oracle.com>
> ---
>   fs/block_dev.c | 6 +++---
>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/block_dev.c b/fs/block_dev.c
> index 0ae656e022fd..ba4fad08cdaf 100644
> --- a/fs/block_dev.c
> +++ b/fs/block_dev.c
> @@ -1062,12 +1062,12 @@ static int bd_prepare_to_claim(struct block_device *bdev,
>   	/* if claiming is already in progress, wait for it to finish */
>   	if (whole->bd_claiming) {
>   		wait_queue_head_t *wq = bit_waitqueue(&whole->bd_claiming, 0);
> -		DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
> +		DEFINE_WAIT_BIT(wait, &whole->bd_claiming, 0);
>   
> -		prepare_to_wait(wq, &wait, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
> +		prepare_to_wait(wq, &wait.wq_entry, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
>   		spin_unlock(&bdev_lock);
>   		schedule();
> -		finish_wait(wq, &wait);
> +		finish_wait(wq, &wait.wq_entry);
>   		spin_lock(&bdev_lock);
>   		goto retry;
>   	}