Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964922AbWEUU0A (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 May 2006 16:26:00 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964934AbWEUU0A (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 May 2006 16:26:00 -0400 Received: from 87-237-56-54.northerncolo.co.uk ([87.237.56.54]:19671 "EHLO totally.trollied.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964922AbWEUUZ7 (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 May 2006 16:25:59 -0400 Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 21:25:56 +0100 From: John Levon To: Dave Jones , Chris Wedgwood , LKML , Linus Torvalds , phil.el@wanadoo.fr, Andrew Morton Subject: Re: Is OPROFILE actively maintained? Message-ID: <20060521202556.GA1453@totally.trollied.org> References: <20060520025322.GD9486@taniwha.stupidest.org> <20060521194915.GA2153@taniwha.stupidest.org> <20060521195710.GL8250@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060521195710.GL8250@redhat.com> X-Url: http://www.movementarian.org/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 715 Lines: 18 On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 03:57:10PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote: > > Given that it should probably stay EXPERIMENTAL for now. I wonder if > > left unmaintained for much longer if it should be potentially marked > > BROKEN and/or scheduled for removal? > > Why on earth would we want to remove a working feature ? I certainly didn't mean to suggest that. But it should certainly stay at EXPERIMENTAL until the project as a whole reaches a stable release. regards, john - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/