Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:a0d1:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp98312pxa; Fri, 21 Aug 2020 02:10:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwrZh8Aw3Hbio2hXL+cW7nAHNr5vVcdxqqjWUKibH8uPoOTYeWj4jfTkftMEaqsyRSBpmvc X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:d102:: with SMTP id b2mr1699951ejz.465.1598001009913; Fri, 21 Aug 2020 02:10:09 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1598001009; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=HyiLuHjU61XxGBrKXqnt5SFZUhpAc3yyEvfZeKiKcTCjRm5ujb19rKZ+ommUNfmYKg jULH5wR1uUHscD3DdzAgxSwV4X1ou+KHNEZJiFEiSfsXUbfq0jtZtRjf46ytgFvjU9dK BWPBPS84z7wMeOLyMUzZN53/FM/WeffnShKA4YyHyvRN4nSvZv0GutlwoITpPt+OCee3 sBDMahCwi6/Vwal0/B4+oHvFMqhPhqsXwuUptOO8E499uIErtpMJTLkMz50Djh/dnhEu vdwIKj3wJYysYBOtRCcXBL+TeJeGdS/A735ArhKqH1iAJEg8okbiPim1GTxWe337u8Lj LhQw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :dkim-signature; bh=ClwOCvNdMbSwIvrMHBCrtpWj2Sg/nFcA0Erlf/v7f9I=; b=f3+SZgzTmogkCjqXd7v0bPnAR7+WIoFzFQ9preFZGaMufHSVMWn1Bzs7TIF7QFqhO4 VS+u0Sq0POowuxBikFyCTjrf2XFRZDG4ZLrCBzZUofmkuS7gpi7K5lxQXT/gE1GaIJca RDzEcjEzVK58pGjCHQqF3qxE1EocsTn3HKWds64yfI70UeezM8M9sD1n8DC2IdvR6Zdq VNdJrubePSbZeJjv4/UUolsZXbh5vNHs20l79lhT5JeNWC7c+Nq4psWHyoouIUSWM2ys KXvHXoCdLT2Y03NJvIykG/ln/yTPO+W2IgiB8FITfS9gVdSAC7HCe+j5pBZjy2sV+HAG Czfg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=pB+qRKM2; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id w10si952992edl.122.2020.08.21.02.09.46; Fri, 21 Aug 2020 02:10:09 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=pB+qRKM2; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727987AbgHUJG2 (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 21 Aug 2020 05:06:28 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50610 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725965AbgHUJG1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Aug 2020 05:06:27 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-x442.google.com (mail-pf1-x442.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::442]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB1D2C061385; Fri, 21 Aug 2020 02:06:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pf1-x442.google.com with SMTP id 17so759768pfw.9; Fri, 21 Aug 2020 02:06:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ClwOCvNdMbSwIvrMHBCrtpWj2Sg/nFcA0Erlf/v7f9I=; b=pB+qRKM2AHS443Cscmz2VK4Ro/JI40bwhD7Jojrqv8T5gBjlAJHShryWeO428vDXYX ba1w9qmlClKif7NBjCAoRMkKUF93bm5sXS8wJu0QtUkrJbhhyqtFDODTNmN5V0lTklSs vkL39anLkBg7pl9m6hMWkwMXJPnmACSdheQtEfT5fo0M9o6448sE4ajPJqRh8iIz4dAT 0bkU/CNmCn78G43XilreYQG+s0mSsgtzijT58BNhCKzJZneW2IDR/Ci5STpAmsl28R9L m8PgYNKRE+rWrQAeEtOUzTB0N9vmecHgcD47MIePwL2oORMeciG+NGBpQD9OQoMlSXd5 lojA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ClwOCvNdMbSwIvrMHBCrtpWj2Sg/nFcA0Erlf/v7f9I=; b=owMckdZwQpIX9bwI1iSY7ifUDL3LAbqXhv1ydeK3wGijcF9uEmFLeOtu9DtbfdHOlO l2O/A6oTlfvvfYyvPaao1lckPV8KQrDmu54oqzvtEI5vjzcHfKsanlNAtleNvEgkAujn LcTdTg5n5972fwk4WBdZW/Ie5Si03aTCN6Vky5K025DUoj6L87w8Pn8MrC11METMF6XD W7Bhcbllp4KiO4L97v5BuR4E9Uh8l5LB6PQj2E3yQORmkI/MIXQ1M+x02/cWv8bmFeer EjkwhmU6jmUWZfEkrzf8AUQM5XQiw5sfVk/5SFhWvNWuWUPtsdnytRDk93XHs0X2J3iV 8g2A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5332SWu5OBKVPvmnfLTTAErWiTaOhNromtavrI0gxLK+ZdlKxDUh f4bx0zyl7+U5WTqcQ1hGero= X-Received: by 2002:a62:6185:: with SMTP id v127mr1627684pfb.259.1598000787273; Fri, 21 Aug 2020 02:06:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([124.156.176.71]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o19sm1388158pjs.8.2020.08.21.02.06.24 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Fri, 21 Aug 2020 02:06:26 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2020 17:06:27 +0800 From: Yue Hu To: David Laight Cc: "rui.zhang@intel.com" , "daniel.lezcano@linaro.org" , "amit.kucheria@verdurent.com" , "viresh.kumar@linaro.org" , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "huyue2@yulong.com" , "zhangwen@yulong.com" Subject: Re: [PATCH] thermal: sysfs: Fall back to vmalloc() for cooling device's statistics Message-ID: <20200821170627.00003d5e.zbestahu@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <7a0c2e488e024c0694fd730f95ba98fb@AcuMS.aculab.com> References: <20200821024406.10404-1-zbestahu@gmail.com> <7a0c2e488e024c0694fd730f95ba98fb@AcuMS.aculab.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.3 (GTK+ 2.24.32; i686-w64-mingw32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 21 Aug 2020 08:39:45 +0000 David Laight wrote: > From: Yue Hu > > Sent: 21 August 2020 03:44 > > > > From: Yue Hu > > > > We observed warning about kzalloc() when register thermal cooling device > > in backlight_device_register(). backlight display can be a cooling device > > since reducing screen brightness will can help reduce temperature. > > > > However, ->get_max_state of backlight will assign max brightness of 1024 > > to states. The memory size can be getting 1MB+ due to states * states. > > That is so large to trigger kmalloc() warning. > > I can't help feeling that there is an 'adequate' implementation > that doesn't require anywhere near 1MB of memory. However, it should be a potential issue due to what i described above, rt? Thx. > > David > > - > Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK > Registration No: 1397386 (Wales) >