Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:a0d1:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp453801pxa; Fri, 21 Aug 2020 11:28:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyYnxVSlbHwTYb5fi3WJNaYUNNL/haYbQSlaLASt0j8lswEqmocOIMR94dizZSJ8FXTl/mu X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:37d1:: with SMTP id o17mr4327975ejc.98.1598034509302; Fri, 21 Aug 2020 11:28:29 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1598034509; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=D66xciRfHLhrhxYYdUeq9HmXMkZ9zcuWE3dKx5UwHSu6mMOpqPPB+IbhzJa0yR3140 MYmrldRAGZ7ReAH7OZPB/1AH1JtjLLxSAmleTJxxg7GplSV1+I58UPUjfQprlRYTH4mt pql3xrNxLngwanNh5+JBl3WZDKSl1BXNABoXm+HIWO4aT67MSOvCxbXzXj/wJsor3dhV sC9XIHaPOnytDrCEQLhijcIG8QUvr5PHnS+j6n5AdERmuKh80l0i8MyeqZo+PzoFiWDK cLS8T/kA5zcdAOh0tmM+bEhvy0mIdJ9RdJmlX5XIGvZGl6eTdiNK+8apDT7Fdmq1ESM7 U7cg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version; bh=Ik24Pn50+AFSzC/zSLjdolgrHNOwiWrGKLY+tyLf6y0=; b=abrcw/sWIbvFUoQuEtpFp3I0jQ2A0dCvRAdhD9jhi5ckJns58y18sDjK2fB2+KfVi1 bAupOEnWwnSjzX7zTHLueadoI6b7qfZ+CECRwCrekTrCq0s7k7P+VQvYfXV+/bXnbkNa R5/6Y3kvD8GJtDRBoQIps2MpwMwOI314KlPhF9emxstIYgILArLQMGnsDITxXrqgaXHs GNllhC1z9Ai083ofZrNx9V+ixAdtylHFT92FQZYaGFEEHE6m2CGsVd8dUQSjhsHPPd3z WLwTdCUZpxlUAC2YBVzlJUaUEGpJd7qq9TtHPOG3WoMEBeN5e+huKljSDX5fU0XV497z IGAQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id oc22si1674420ejb.267.2020.08.21.11.28.05; Fri, 21 Aug 2020 11:28:29 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726435AbgHUSXj (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 21 Aug 2020 14:23:39 -0400 Received: from mail-ej1-f66.google.com ([209.85.218.66]:44428 "EHLO mail-ej1-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725867AbgHUSXi (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Aug 2020 14:23:38 -0400 Received: by mail-ej1-f66.google.com with SMTP id bo3so3370593ejb.11; Fri, 21 Aug 2020 11:23:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Ik24Pn50+AFSzC/zSLjdolgrHNOwiWrGKLY+tyLf6y0=; b=U3uAWmAM8cM9zKJNmyPNPB1xStNLANuE/X+x2cdKaLZxri4cj169hCQx+BOJS9sa0p bLCReuCX8x1hQTXz6aG1zcSG9bYAzbJb+6yHzxhx5U8zyHAxzCXUsPuJWNa0T6wXLwbz 1rytH7gDJoAmj8TqsKqlF73PekWP/IgK/4yfAoLF5pwhEOaMw0fokRh3ZAmBLQyZ5VN5 RTEm8g5NkP5bM9HsNp38Qv7VuX2s4Z+q5s4zCJyJDlvSacCOciiHaELmpkx5Pt/olEmN j9vi34w1Nfx+b6FfGosoNSYtTBsFyUrJXVfU3Gxoje+gUowetatZDdmDWLZP08w02bYy 31dw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5307UYjhf36sNr9NWMn9PyiDJu6BlQMyj8o1ojYwCLAIfOA4Qh3u ugB6Jqt49X1CDGo7Q9m59DoGgJrYOybk8lOoA6y8JwJ2 X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:a219:: with SMTP id r25mr4211610ejy.201.1598034216965; Fri, 21 Aug 2020 11:23:36 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200810144330.75613-1-darcari@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20200810144330.75613-1-darcari@redhat.com> From: Len Brown Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2020 14:23:25 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] tools/power turbostat: fix output formatting for ACPI CST enumeration To: David Arcari Cc: Linux PM list , Linux Kernel Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Dave, I think this is fine. Indeed, I actually went ahead and applied it a week or so ago. the only alternative that I can think of is actually shortening the ACPI C-state names in the intel_idle driver -- which is still an option. It would not be the first time we have tweaked the names used in that driver to make tools more happy... My apology for neglecting to send you an ACK. I had intended to send my queued series to the list, which would suffice for all the ACKs, but that send and the subsequent push got delayed by this and that. So I'll try to ack as I go, so it is clear at any time where a patch stands. thanks! Len Brown, Intel Open Source Technology Center