Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20200526131259.GA97001@jade> <20200821184910.GB3407@lx2k> <f7c8bb6e-e732-2565-8b50-20f5504701c9@nvidia.com>
In-Reply-To: <f7c8bb6e-e732-2565-8b50-20f5504701c9@nvidia.com>
From:   Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Date:   Fri, 21 Aug 2020 14:18:53 -0700
Message-ID: <CAOesGMjKq3ECJuaMANq=AyDMLXYvorafMYS3LDr9YMH6M9VdYA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] tee subsystem pin_user_pages for v5.8
To:     John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
Cc:     Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@linaro.org>,
        ARM-SoC Maintainers <arm@kernel.org>,
        SoC Team <soc@kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        tee-dev@lists.linaro.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 12:58 PM John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com> wrote:
>
> On 8/21/20 11:49 AM, Olof Johansson wrote:
> > On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 03:12:59PM +0200, Jens Wiklander wrote:
> >> Hello arm-soc maintainers,
> >>
> >> Please pull this small patch converting the tee subsystem to use
> >> pin_user_pages() instead of get_user_pages().
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Jens
> >>
> >> The following changes since commit ae83d0b416db002fe95601e7f97f64b59514d936:
> >>
> >>    Linux 5.7-rc2 (2020-04-19 14:35:30 -0700)
> >>
> >> are available in the Git repository at:
> >>
> >>    git://git.linaro.org:/people/jens.wiklander/linux-tee.git tags/tee-pin-user-pages-for-5.8
> >>
> >> for you to fetch changes up to 37f6b4d5f47b600ec4ab6682c005a44a1bfca530:
> >>
> >>    tee: convert get_user_pages() --> pin_user_pages() (2020-05-26 10:42:41 +0200)
> >
> > Hi, I noticed this never got merged, but I don't see any follow-up here that
> > retracts it. Is it still pending merge such that I should queue it for v5.10?
> >
>
> I think so. I had marked it in my notes as "accepted, and the maintainer will
> eventually merge it", and I left it at that. It's still desirable.
>

Looks like it conflicts with some of the later work. Jens, given the
timelines here it's probably easiest all around if you rebase/respin
and send a fresh pull request. I could fix it up but you'd still need
to review that so the amount of work is probably less if you do it
directly.


-Olof