Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] arm64: dts: qcom: Add support for Xiaomi Poco F1
 (Beryllium)
To:     Amit Pundir <amit.pundir@linaro.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
        Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
Cc:     linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
        dt <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
References: <1598029961-2474-1-git-send-email-amit.pundir@linaro.org>
From:   Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <23c4191e-4d64-80d8-e688-27d004729ea1@gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 21 Aug 2020 23:21:25 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.11.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1598029961-2474-1-git-send-email-amit.pundir@linaro.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi

First of all, sorry if anybody sees this twice. I've been messing with Thunderbird lately.


> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM)	+= sdm845-cheza-r3.dtb
> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM)	+= sdm845-db845c.dtb
> +dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM)	+= sdm845-beryllium.dtb

[B]eryllium should come before [C]heza, no? Also, aren't the non-development boards supposed to include the vendor name? i.e. sdm845-(xiaomi/poco)-beryllium.dtb


> +	model = "Xiaomi Technologies Inc. Beryllium";

At least with Xperias, we settled on setting the model property to the "pretty" name, in this case Poco F1


> +	pm8998-rpmh-regulators {
> +		compatible = "qcom,pm8998-rpmh-regulators";
> +		qcom,pmic-id = "a";
> +
> +		vreg_l1a_0p875: ldo1 {

I think you forgot to include (regulatorname)-supply properties which should cause havoc with all things regulators..


> +		vreg_l1a_0p875: ldo1 {
> +			regulator-min-microvolt = <880000>;
> +			regulator-max-microvolt = <880000>;
0p88? Unless it's a PMIC limitation.. Please also confirm names for the rest of the regulators.

Also why are there so few regulators? And none from pmi8998? Are the rest WIP/coming in a followup commit, or are they disabled on this board? AFAICS you only include SoC/PMIC DTs which would suggest they should be there.


> +/* Reserved memory changes from downstream */

Wouldn't it look better if you included that in the main {} node instead of reopening it in the middle of the file? I mean, it works, but let's hear what others have to say.


> +			 * It seems that mmc_test reports errors if drive
> +			 * strength is not 16 on clk, cmd, and data pins.

You say that, but then you set "drive-strength = <10>;" for cmd and data, please confirm it's intentional.


> +&ufs_mem_hc {

UFS comes before USB alphabetically.


> +&ufs_mem_phy

Ditto


> +&qup_uart6_default

Ditto


Konrad