Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750763AbWEVLhx (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 May 2006 07:37:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750764AbWEVLhx (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 May 2006 07:37:53 -0400 Received: from outpipe-village-512-1.bc.nu ([81.2.110.250]:13015 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750763AbWEVLhx (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 May 2006 07:37:53 -0400 Subject: Re: Is OPROFILE actively maintained? From: Alan Cox To: Chris Wedgwood Cc: LKML , Linus Torvalds , levon@movementarian.org, phil.el@wanadoo.fr, Andrew Morton In-Reply-To: <20060521194915.GA2153@taniwha.stupidest.org> References: <20060520025322.GD9486@taniwha.stupidest.org> <20060521194915.GA2153@taniwha.stupidest.org> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 12:51:21 +0100 Message-Id: <1148298681.17376.23.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 (2.2.3-4.fc4) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 548 Lines: 14 On Sul, 2006-05-21 at 12:49 -0700, Chris Wedgwood wrote: > Some feedback claims this is not the case and that "it's unmaintained, > rarely well-tested, By which theory we should ditch ia-64 while we are at it. Be serious, oprofile is good working code, even if you have some personal problem with it. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/