Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:a0d1:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp784782pxa; Fri, 21 Aug 2020 23:20:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz3fhHTRt2oTSIX92VayrN4o6deJAhr3MhJPX6E/FWgrVYf+Waf7MZ+AwSnKD5Tzr23hap4 X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:b08:: with SMTP id u8mr6213251ejg.401.1598077240937; Fri, 21 Aug 2020 23:20:40 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1598077240; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=QL87Y3smlehKbNjEidMRzKmQNkYQuVehYg3Q8W7ttJYh9K8xQs5OBCBtrY0u/l6qUw xSLSGJgHpX2bkuEHowh1kottI6k31/et8mC4C3CRglJwGsr08wM8aV/hIP4mR2UCC1W4 uV2F5whZ9nDjuEwAgssFtGKS7n/ssp+vQxDFgTZW7jkORlf6IerbbaM9bpAbbWfSIJZA L2q1uCDTnsYmESC1/Qa4wmhi6I9kZuAQQG4WAv/pdzfWfvbtRLHKJg4Y6ko6Vb869wiN 1DXaQs/7S6FtLA4zO67pPefFYFAtXmZzMTFwfE682RFfMnEneZef3m5oHTrrAeNMw+Go w4VQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:user-agent:message-id :in-reply-to:date:references:subject:cc:to:from:dkim-signature; bh=cZB+WkSeRDRzpIbHQGzgmF0aIP+uDLOrn6R+/fwUj94=; b=hkNaWWpY/Gr1HXqREwbOop0rhm6OY1uO+NOgsqpWKT7GaO/js+QqjL5gmEMcP4NTYY N0gyilm7iFIOgcQ0sd4xfSn7BTP/T2VNsYuuQtizkdjQYLT4IohT8Ff+yl09y1gAGi7r 3W6GC0qk9O2PKtxG0v/ahXCkTqHvS/q0I09Cfcl0vHFFlXwr/X/kTG1vSY291b/g0y9k HPUgZ1IQ4P+7EeqACQppzg5dVfWX7l4mEf4j0uMBrFe07/4pPHSIAuT3l6EWSox1rZiH z2WzS5EaQTceeubpEaM0x8M31obIooasf+IjwSn7HROxKTdD/3SUexfEX7EUwIgbkJ55 BvfQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmx.net header.s=badeba3b8450 header.b=KnDAM6vk; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id o17si3040477ejg.21.2020.08.21.23.20.05; Fri, 21 Aug 2020 23:20:40 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmx.net header.s=badeba3b8450 header.b=KnDAM6vk; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726883AbgHVGQm (ORCPT + 99 others); Sat, 22 Aug 2020 02:16:42 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.15]:46905 "EHLO mout.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725863AbgHVGQk (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 Aug 2020 02:16:40 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1598076989; bh=Pds2nMEdMqJGmiN8TaXP+FYbIXOVvaSmTp36080KACw=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=KnDAM6vkKh2/9L58XEF/UYN8Q1S0PXbNotY7T3ktmxy7dzQ+fIFQfAcQCorWmCIjm bw3yo1thRmLkvvsxgeZPG/fC8OtHO3N0ombjn3R+6dQyIp2cPlKJWrx1XvY0sKOkmO rdmZXLazgKfuGNq7CQLIerw3Jv6tvhxuRGDymVcc= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Received: from localhost.localdomain ([79.223.54.124]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx004 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1Mk0JW-1ktNsT1jzs-00kMlr; Sat, 22 Aug 2020 08:16:29 +0200 Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 75AE5800D6; Sat, 22 Aug 2020 08:16:25 +0200 (CEST) From: Sven Joachim To: Brian Vazquez Cc: Stephen Rothwell , David Miller , Networking , Linux Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree References: <20200729212721.1ee4eef8@canb.auug.org.au> <87ft8lwxes.fsf@turtle.gmx.de> Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2020 08:16:25 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Brian Vazquez's message of "Fri, 21 Aug 2020 09:23:17 -0700") Message-ID: <87y2m7gq86.fsf@turtle.gmx.de> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:vXMPwaa+GWBvgfx31Fh6V/bMiIMoiS8S+gl3mgGSj199RHnhCOX L8E71us4f9DvfWkSzMw4W1001t8xAt11HCeskYJa55GfHcTWfVVGflM/8DjckK32WkWM+yL MYUDKGcq6NGSrjwtvs3taO2PBg9o4HLA23+TDRemfhq4T/Io+xDvNM/HL/v7nc16jMUu08e gNlFdLYx6RFPKy3qbgExw== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:V8drswwBsOE=:cNNLwN/v9CH3zRXLNN9gln 2sfXCSHGM8/OaV5hjhzS8tPyImxRIThNQlaDAXUMdB5IfZre69tAzs5/pRjIw/riJUUD3mp1J vRBx+YdMKuVUM4ieR7fHs46Ohbqfxh1ahbB58Z155YZ92fPySnomhlF4ITqTqkzci3pDETajc scgc+z54PKUgghEo0AmoRTi/Xdo6ScIZ+KQZymzYL59HscsjNaviyhYNIYN2BcYjpY3CcImFB 0Q0e1y0532vRBbXa+iZTZm0mZfwUK8blPO0MlyNaLfDCcoIv3MMlH4k440Hsw7+1Kb1W6k9vu nDC34pONadhbg0bDXFMFClHqrg3ZqnaEwdU75ZOKyu82b0fNjQOJHE991xjZLxw5WZC1/fz8s kerjT2Buu86GYEQGYqzYy72Z5XLJ+HuzMC1lHwQpKrEcTavZzt7vC/Lr/h6dnYbZld9lSaUUy IzOct6FYlJVefslSX78JviXjRJhMZ+RK6I+4eRkLi9Haj4BqTzaMgRcl4M9bP1i89P0K7YkHd UF+bgpMzN3UyyF4HOlHBfcc5bcSkCKkKm4mfkvsQ/McrStQm/mwYERGfUt0OIbnQvgAs7mJRk U4sPVTCvT1OqMfpimKnul+YEQglHj9FT/mvJRJYWygekSU3Php1hzRzSTrShwbyJeCxPPfEj3 TmxE+vIi7iFvISpryQ0fC8bfcV6JF2qDxt82Y2tRtYFL8jmpyGPw3/8oSzwxW/WA990XO1PjK xUV2l2vubBj5DFHarn9PGMth3IKNf+KxfvF6nPpk9FCAY+hvwUEQhCoPFiDxQwrrqRDf2fhLv CVvZLyCYPJl7m1hIdIe+fVF8lttnIiGiikuTVSF2bxhDwJcyDfH3KMdFmHvUvR2Kn63MIlRXM dNFYJAiFaC0SK6SSlZ/8tEXFfgb8vZ63F+XgmJkfdwUS+H+NJc9KTBWEd9BS4gL0NrUjpAtAS sWd+VwGvZDd4BfQhOq8OvxTvPMkQjDyy0BTikpWPoe2eW006l/UiPFhGrxKquIT4JUH9/ntz+ G0wHEZm0BAhblXhX8G3lLft2REica24vsi0p0aJppyDsBYjJ8lC+XPSZYbGnZxt2rBSchFdGx +WWAaZsBNZdyICryIqZaz9YhdLmf0U4EG5Tw6azegmBKBhTGbbBYqmQU/NwvYHJwSxSLIJ8Om eV1HQ5lfnyqy1vfntXtReyLKJdiyoydQvGx8nOz20FOsdz0ddieq2ICmDDsHHd603kF7oBjhr bs6fCkHtv5D9BIiQK Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2020-08-21 09:23 -0700, Brian Vazquez wrote: > Hi Sven, > > Sorry for the late reply, did you still see this after: > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/patch/20200803131948.41736-1-yuehaibing@huawei.com/ > ?? That patch is apparently already in 5.9-rc1 as commit 80fbbb1672e7, so yes I'm still seeing it. Cheers, Sven > On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 12:21 AM Sven Joachim wrote: > >> On 2020-07-29 21:27 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> >> > Hi all, >> > >> > After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (i386 >> defconfig) >> > failed like this: >> > >> > x86_64-linux-gnu-ld: net/core/fib_rules.o: in function >> `fib_rules_lookup': >> > fib_rules.c:(.text+0x5c6): undefined reference to `fib6_rule_match' >> > x86_64-linux-gnu-ld: fib_rules.c:(.text+0x5d8): undefined reference to >> `fib6_rule_match' >> > x86_64-linux-gnu-ld: fib_rules.c:(.text+0x64d): undefined reference to >> `fib6_rule_action' >> > x86_64-linux-gnu-ld: fib_rules.c:(.text+0x662): undefined reference to >> `fib6_rule_action' >> > x86_64-linux-gnu-ld: fib_rules.c:(.text+0x67a): undefined reference to >> `fib6_rule_suppress' >> > x86_64-linux-gnu-ld: fib_rules.c:(.text+0x68d): undefined reference to >> `fib6_rule_suppress' >> >> FWIW, I saw these errors in 5.9-rc1 today, so the fix in commit >> 41d707b7332f ("fib: fix fib_rules_ops indirect calls wrappers") was >> apparently not sufficient. >> >> ,---- >> | $ grep IPV6 .config >> | CONFIG_IPV6=m >> | # CONFIG_IPV6_ROUTER_PREF is not set >> | # CONFIG_IPV6_OPTIMISTIC_DAD is not set >> | # CONFIG_IPV6_MIP6 is not set >> | # CONFIG_IPV6_ILA is not set >> | # CONFIG_IPV6_VTI is not set >> | CONFIG_IPV6_SIT=m >> | # CONFIG_IPV6_SIT_6RD is not set >> | CONFIG_IPV6_NDISC_NODETYPE=y >> | CONFIG_IPV6_TUNNEL=m >> | CONFIG_IPV6_MULTIPLE_TABLES=y >> | # CONFIG_IPV6_SUBTREES is not set >> | # CONFIG_IPV6_MROUTE is not set >> | # CONFIG_IPV6_SEG6_LWTUNNEL is not set >> | # CONFIG_IPV6_SEG6_HMAC is not set >> | # CONFIG_IPV6_RPL_LWTUNNEL is not set >> | # CONFIG_NF_SOCKET_IPV6 is not set >> | # CONFIG_NF_TPROXY_IPV6 is not set >> | # CONFIG_NF_DUP_IPV6 is not set >> | # CONFIG_NF_REJECT_IPV6 is not set >> | # CONFIG_NF_LOG_IPV6 is not set >> | CONFIG_NF_DEFRAG_IPV6=m >> `---- >> >> > Caused by commit >> > >> > b9aaec8f0be5 ("fib: use indirect call wrappers in the most common >> fib_rules_ops") >> > >> > # CONFIG_IPV6_MULTIPLE_TABLES is not set >> > >> > I have reverted that commit for today. >> >> Cheers, >> Sven >>