Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750926AbWEVPPx (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 May 2006 11:15:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750929AbWEVPPx (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 May 2006 11:15:53 -0400 Received: from 87-237-56-54.northerncolo.co.uk ([87.237.56.54]:1004 "EHLO totally.trollied.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750926AbWEVPPw (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 May 2006 11:15:52 -0400 Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 16:15:28 +0100 From: John Levon To: Alan Cox Cc: Chris Wedgwood , LKML , Linus Torvalds , phil.el@wanadoo.fr, Andrew Morton Subject: Re: Is OPROFILE actively maintained? Message-ID: <20060522151528.GA20960@totally.trollied.org> References: <20060520025322.GD9486@taniwha.stupidest.org> <20060521194915.GA2153@taniwha.stupidest.org> <1148298681.17376.23.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1148298681.17376.23.camel@localhost.localdomain> X-Url: http://www.movementarian.org/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 606 Lines: 16 On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 12:51:21PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > Be serious, oprofile is good working code, even if you have some > personal problem with it. Does the opinion of the former mantainer count for nothing? If nothing else, it should remain experimental on arches like Alpha, where there's a whole bunch of events that can't possibly work. regards john - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/