Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 29 Oct 2001 15:03:19 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 29 Oct 2001 15:03:09 -0500 Received: from mail.pha.ha-vel.cz ([195.39.72.3]:27653 "HELO mail.pha.ha-vel.cz") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Mon, 29 Oct 2001 15:02:59 -0500 Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2001 21:03:33 +0100 From: Vojtech Pavlik To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" Cc: Alan Cox , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.13-ac4 Message-ID: <20011029210333.A4828@suse.cz> In-Reply-To: <20011028204003.A1640@lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl on Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 05:07:51PM +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 05:07:51PM +0100, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > On Sun, 28 Oct 2001, Alan Cox wrote: > > > o Handle chipsets that dont get 8254 latches (Roberto Biancardi) > > right and trigger the VIA warning in error > > Hmm, has anyone tried using the "read back" 8254 command for latching, > instead? Chances are it's less buggy... We can try, but I think that it's more likely to be more buggy, because it isn't widely used by software. And at least according to the 8254 docs they should be equivalent in what they do. -- Vojtech Pavlik SuSE Labs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/