Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Mon, 24 Aug 2020 17:38:11 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     "zhangyi (F)" <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
        Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>, stable@kernel.org,
        Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.9 15/39] jbd2: add the missing unlock_buffer() in the
 error path of jbd2_write_superblock()
Message-ID: <20200824153811.GC435319@kroah.com>
References: <20200824082348.445866152@linuxfoundation.org>
 <20200824082349.270439673@linuxfoundation.org>
 <72009693-6c2a-df4f-f93a-31b5924e7790@huawei.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <72009693-6c2a-df4f-f93a-31b5924e7790@huawei.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 07:15:25PM +0800, zhangyi (F) wrote:
> Hi，Greg
> 
> The problem this patch want to fix only exists on the kernel both
> 538bcaa6261b and 742b06b5628f these two upstream patches were merged,
> but 538bcaa6261b was not merged to 4.9, so we don't need this patch
> for 4.9.

Ok, thanks, but that wasn't obvious at all :)

I'll go drop this from 4.9.y now...

greg k-h