Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:a0d1:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp2237830pxa; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 08:50:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyZcnp8XFU+MWNkqdAatIE1/VGP7z9u2DjD/ju9e+a+hX0ZmiTDFkxWfKsZhxHHrm31rrW3 X-Received: by 2002:aa7:cd52:: with SMTP id v18mr5010039edw.165.1598284201543; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 08:50:01 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1598284201; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=cFTbqyObebRZJ9C73/kAh3xtJ7M5alVZaDmkEw3bKrdn0eWRvBr3PxxHWZlpYy1iMM 4DAEleKk2Z3xIfiefmYI6t6Fkv4VxdYmGqiQDpy7Q3riY/x1RdUbI5Aip7eeWR6sSKNM wbw54Q1cqeuy5wF7V/jz1B6s8LmJ/4/TpdMT3zD1QR/sPR7dkC7X/k6g17V5VRmSaOy8 rqSZ8evQfQFUwoEpknW7QSLS2Os+8RQWWGeBiy7stV/YTjP8RkGAdzOXQ2FukMZ8wMX3 8bE7GZodlAbjovQlUTmrkczUC5MOeOMak4Q/MuMa5GOSo/vLAIAN0ZfNg7qN/zb4z1M/ l/DA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:ironport-sdr:ironport-sdr; bh=IxQw558BqSkv6aL0NmgaSglXxX0Wu72mgA7jXDgCDws=; b=zCQ/ZjxeOPQWnjzjpueA7ArNcRGlTlzm3BQfFLmMc4sGy07g6HOqvRIJ5nFa7NV+7F juQv2t+vz39TB1gejm9Yj0Kjm1k8NuvHpk9r0MKqgKli+9EwA5gXRD0RWjZDJCxMCT47 ndETfI9TnjNQfyrLaOryorbh6UUUiPgz2xdA6tdd1HHvk30aw9yEkehdAkpnJrJZXehW ozBDHrOKfChVu8iJk2cjL86OhAvSDd0cfrIyWbjP3bmDbbsSESB0PodHRpF80C88OP9N Cg99+h6E9Xu4kfIehHMhtIELbFaCAK3aUf8AdBhIWG+P7IorPV7h7nj0AIrulJSy1RR4 g90Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id s11si7313098edi.214.2020.08.24.08.49.38; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 08:50:01 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1725973AbgHXPsi (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 24 Aug 2020 11:48:38 -0400 Received: from mga06.intel.com ([134.134.136.31]:36560 "EHLO mga06.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726374AbgHXPsX (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Aug 2020 11:48:23 -0400 IronPort-SDR: ZK1JCUw0SgOyHqNhlS2T+86/N1AOFFpAtUAafJDskC8OmaDquyhgdQ/weNM6+cm/AMrjpTbNY6 hbyvAgMNWwZg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9722"; a="217464446" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.76,349,1592895600"; d="scan'208";a="217464446" X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga006.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.51]) by orsmga104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 24 Aug 2020 08:48:23 -0700 IronPort-SDR: jnr+6qjcEgTvvkrseGxF9XNoE+ylVqyWrTlX6PSSkmeE1x9y2/sRY5ZuFhMsWRjCMTaBQ+QP8R 8K22yHgo/jJg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.76,349,1592895600"; d="scan'208";a="298757873" Received: from shbuild999.sh.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.239.146.107]) by orsmga006.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 24 Aug 2020 08:48:21 -0700 Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 23:48:18 +0800 From: Feng Tang To: "Luck, Tony" Cc: Borislav Petkov , "Chen, Rong A" , LKML , "lkp@lists.01.org" , Mel Gorman Subject: Re: [LKP] Re: [x86/mce] 1de08dccd3: will-it-scale.per_process_ops -14.1% regression Message-ID: <20200824154818.GB56944@shbuild999.sh.intel.com> References: <20200425114414.GU26573@shao2-debian> <20200425130136.GA28245@zn.tnic> <20200818082943.GA65567@shbuild999.sh.intel.com> <20200818200654.GA21494@agluck-desk2.amr.corp.intel.com> <20200819020437.GA2605@shbuild999.sh.intel.com> <20200821020259.GA90000@shbuild999.sh.intel.com> <20200824151425.GF4794@zn.tnic> <20200824153300.GA56944@shbuild999.sh.intel.com> <6e996ad05e434a6fb13f069ee72b876b@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6e996ad05e434a6fb13f069ee72b876b@intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 11:38:53PM +0800, Luck, Tony wrote: > > Yes, that's what we suspected. And I just did another try to force the > > percpu mce structure aligned. And the regression seems to be gone (reduced > > from 14.1% to 2%), which further proved it. > > I wonder whether it would be useful for bisection of performance issues > for you to change the global definition of DEFINE_PER_CPU() to make > all per CPU definitions aligned. Just like you switch compiler flags to make > all functions aligned. Thanks for the hint! This will definitely help tracking strange performance changes like this, as a general debug mthod. Thanks, Feng > > -Tony