Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:a0d1:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp2321685pxa; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 10:51:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx2dXB0PPt40I/3DXEi4y7A1lO8W5v/kxzcg5nG6/QJEizQmjd1Zsbvxiw8Po9mJ7hxeHAL X-Received: by 2002:aa7:c5c3:: with SMTP id h3mr6782639eds.246.1598291503443; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 10:51:43 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1598291503; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=a28BTP7EAV78assdenwCX/3BqvJSYTCYb/eccgMvmudzegH2NeLRoJncueGMLLHmHR hpvI2PiJhAz658O443fSX8fzsAlqBlAXxTYWo1AIooIbZAZYdi/KhVMyXqzb2Jr9qW91 CiThGiUM5dDw7d+GMMIxSTXXIPfTZFM+OHUfpU+N1Q3TnkOJgSOIUwCsKgR+px250DuD PqcsovYLEKG/6N7DLiwo02dpwVx0olEhJhc8hGDyqzWtTsJ9sJWadSBsw03YenDK48Ms Jfc7ajqYyGp0QCOqfVX3dh+dtRw+9hJt8bfQhZMWqcBvKydoiL3riwVhBjjYm349HVbT vUWg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from; bh=00PvT5ggo6l/vi4iFD4kJQ0QANOZusfAbhEOefTHLNc=; b=Ox7jq6VyqDkd1yh24mCYbXE5w8+G9qe5RlF+6FjaTkKE0qLInunZgz9fJgyNlXzbmy IcQFqXZYUwp447gozRHNCd3qITGWUguNuKAXhiLV2TPR10Vn+UC7xrr7YbeCvWDf2k5f gMHWahoIm6COXO6anxQcIhZuWkzD8iWqdO+eQs4nNKiHsbJ4d4DsElVOZs2Fpfvzg7SY 8vWGmNqj5u3WMQn2P1lbmn3PCX0sjmwJjn7QLoszBwZLDeYYW6y2ffiNvgu4WT8iQxYa 1Hdc98al4T2rTfGz9b23YX2eZH0nNbT+oZjNTRFrxSvbXI1aql08K9al0Eddai4m7fbl 2DeA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f9si7154664ejt.242.2020.08.24.10.51.20; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 10:51:43 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726739AbgHXRsP (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 24 Aug 2020 13:48:15 -0400 Received: from cloudserver094114.home.pl ([79.96.170.134]:58178 "EHLO cloudserver094114.home.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725780AbgHXRsL (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Aug 2020 13:48:11 -0400 Received: from 89-64-88-199.dynamic.chello.pl (89.64.88.199) (HELO kreacher.localnet) by serwer1319399.home.pl (79.96.170.134) with SMTP (IdeaSmtpServer 0.83.459) id 9859b31d30dcfd9f; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 19:48:09 +0200 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Linux PM Cc: Srinivas Pandruvada , LKML , Doug Smythies Subject: [PATCH v2 5/5] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Restore cached EPP value during offline Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 19:47:59 +0200 Message-ID: <6584670.ihXX3PbFol@kreacher> In-Reply-To: <4169555.5IIHXK4Dsd@kreacher> References: <4169555.5IIHXK4Dsd@kreacher> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Because hwp_req_cached contains the effective EPP value (0) when the "performance" scaling algorithm is used in the active mode, replace it with the cached EPP value during CPU offline to prevent it from being used (unexpectedly) after switching over from the active mode to the passive mode. Also rename intel_pstate_hwp_force_min_perf() because it will do more than just forcing the minimum performance now. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki --- -> v2: New patch. --- drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c index 37731d45f0ea..61d7179bccdd 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c @@ -904,14 +904,25 @@ static void intel_pstate_hwp_set(unsigned int cpu) wrmsrl_on_cpu(cpu, MSR_HWP_REQUEST, value); } -static void intel_pstate_hwp_force_min_perf(int cpu) +static void intel_pstate_hwp_offline(int cpu) { - u64 value; + struct cpudata *cpudata = all_cpu_data[cpu]; + u64 value = READ_ONCE(cpudata->hwp_req_cached); int min_perf; - value = all_cpu_data[cpu]->hwp_req_cached; + if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_HWP_EPP)) { + /* + * In case the EPP has been set to "performance" by the + * active mode "performance" scaling algorithm, replace that + * temporary value with the cached EPP one. + */ + value &= ~GENMASK_ULL(31, 24); + value |= HWP_ENERGY_PERF_PREFERENCE(cpudata->epp_cached); + WRITE_ONCE(cpudata->hwp_req_cached, value); + } + value &= ~GENMASK_ULL(31, 0); - min_perf = HWP_LOWEST_PERF(all_cpu_data[cpu]->hwp_cap_cached); + min_perf = HWP_LOWEST_PERF(cpudata->hwp_cap_cached); /* Set hwp_max = hwp_min */ value |= HWP_MAX_PERF(min_perf); @@ -2313,7 +2324,7 @@ static int intel_pstate_cpu_offline(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) * performance on CPU offline to prevent that from happening. */ if (hwp_active) - intel_pstate_hwp_force_min_perf(policy->cpu); + intel_pstate_hwp_offline(policy->cpu); else intel_pstate_set_min_pstate(all_cpu_data[policy->cpu]); -- 2.26.2