Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Mon, 24 Aug 2020 17:04:57 -0600
From:   Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
To:     Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@st.com>
Cc:     Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
        Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>,
        linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] rpmsg: ns: name service announcement endianness
Message-ID: <20200824230457.GF3938186@xps15>
References: <20200731114732.12815-1-arnaud.pouliquen@st.com>
 <20200731114732.12815-10-arnaud.pouliquen@st.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200731114732.12815-10-arnaud.pouliquen@st.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 01:47:32PM +0200, Arnaud Pouliquen wrote:
> The endianness has to be fixed to ensure that both sides can
> decode the message. The Little endian format is used according
> to the generic virtio implementation.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@st.com>
> ---
>  drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_ns.c | 17 +++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_ns.c b/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_ns.c
> index cc2bd47c415a..b478e2b55213 100644
> --- a/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_ns.c
> +++ b/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_ns.c
> @@ -33,8 +33,8 @@ enum rpmsg_ns_flags {
>   */
>  struct rpmsg_ns_msg {
>  	char name[RPMSG_NAME_SIZE];
> -	u32 addr;
> -	u32 flags;
> +	__le32 addr;
> +	__le32 flags;
>  } __packed;
>  
>  /**
> @@ -57,8 +57,8 @@ static int rpmsg_ns_channel_announce(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev, int ns_flag)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
>  	strncpy(nsm.name, rpdev->id.name, RPMSG_NAME_SIZE);
> -	nsm.addr = rpdev->ept->addr;
> -	nsm.flags = ns_flag;
> +	nsm.addr = cpu_to_le32(rpdev->ept->addr);
> +	nsm.flags = cpu_to_le32(ns_flag);
>  
>  	return rpmsg_send_offchannel(rpdev->ept, RPMSG_NS_ADDR, RPMSG_NS_ADDR,
>  				     &nsm, sizeof(nsm));
> @@ -84,6 +84,7 @@ static int rpmsg_ns_cb(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev, void *data, int len,
>  	struct rpmsg_device *newch;
>  	struct rpmsg_channel_info chinfo;
>  	struct device *dev = &rpdev->dev;
> +	unsigned int flags = le32_to_cpu(msg->flags);
>  	int ret;
>  
>  #if defined(CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG)
> @@ -101,13 +102,13 @@ static int rpmsg_ns_cb(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev, void *data, int len,
>  
>  	strncpy(chinfo.name, msg->name, sizeof(chinfo.name));
>  	chinfo.src = RPMSG_ADDR_ANY;
> -	chinfo.dst = msg->addr;
> +	chinfo.dst = le32_to_cpu(msg->addr);
>  
>  	dev_info(dev, "%sing channel %s addr 0x%x\n",
> -		 msg->flags & RPMSG_NS_DESTROY ? "destroy" : "creat",
> -		 msg->name, msg->addr);
> +		 flags & RPMSG_NS_DESTROY ? "destroy" : "creat",
> +		 msg->name, chinfo.dst);
>  
> -	if (msg->flags & RPMSG_NS_DESTROY) {
> +	if (flags & RPMSG_NS_DESTROY) {
>  		ret = rpmsg_release_channel(rpdev, &chinfo);
>  		if (ret)
>  			dev_err(dev, "rpmsg_destroy_channel failed: %d\n", ret);

Please merge this patch to patch 5, I don't see a need for doing this
separately.

Thanks,
Mathieu

> -- 
> 2.17.1
>