Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 29 Oct 2001 15:54:43 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 29 Oct 2001 15:54:33 -0500 Received: from zero.tech9.net ([209.61.188.187]:48651 "EHLO zero.tech9.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 29 Oct 2001 15:54:22 -0500 Subject: Re: [BUG] Smbfs + preempt on 2.4.10 From: Robert Love To: J Sloan Cc: vda , linux kernel In-Reply-To: <3BDDA646.B5D0E526@lexus.com> In-Reply-To: <01102919120800.05333@nemo> <3BDDA646.B5D0E526@lexus.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution/0.16.99+cvs.2001.10.28.13.59 (Preview Release) Date: 29 Oct 2001 15:53:32 -0500 Message-Id: <1004388815.805.11.camel@phantasy> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2001-10-29 at 13:56, J Sloan wrote: > vda wrote: > > I narrowed down Samba weirdness I observe on 2.4.10 to preempt patch. > > Plain 2.4.10 works fine, 2.4.10+preempt (with latency measurement turned on) > > is sometimes oopses, and sometimes reports 'file already exists' when I > > attempt to copy a file from WinNT box to Linux. Sometimes it works ok > > (50% or so...) > > Why not try a recent kernel + preempt? Yes, would you mind retesting on a recent kernel and a recent patch? Patches for kernels as old as 2.4.12 and as recent as the current pre-releases are available at: http://tech9.net/rml/linux/ I use samba myself a _lot_ here and I have not observed any problems, even with our older patches... although I don't copy NT->Linux very often. Robert Love - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/