From: Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>
To: Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@compuserve.com>
Subject: Re: [stable][patch] x86_64: fix number of ia32 syscalls
Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 16:33:50 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1
References: <200605221701_MC3-1-C081-B4B3@compuserve.com>
In-Reply-To: <200605221701_MC3-1-C081-B4B3@compuserve.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>,
       Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>, Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>,
       linux-stable <stable@kernel.org>,
       linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200605231633.51186.mb@bu3sch.de>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 913
Lines: 22

On Monday 22 May 2006 22:59, you wrote:
> Recent discussions about whether to print a message about unimplemented
> ia32 syscalls on x86_64 have missed the real bug: the number of ia32
> syscalls is wrong in 2.6.16.  Fixing that kills the message.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@compuserve.com>
> 
> --- 2.6.16.17-64.orig/include/asm-x86_64/ia32_unistd.h
> +++ 2.6.16.17-64/include/asm-x86_64/ia32_unistd.h
> @@ -317,6 +317,6 @@
>  #define __NR_ia32_ppoll			309
>  #define __NR_ia32_unshare		310
>  
> -#define IA32_NR_syscalls 315	/* must be > than biggest syscall! */

Maybe fix the comment so this is more clear, too?
/* must be biggest syscall + 1 */
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/