Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Tue, 25 Aug 2020 12:41:27 -0300
From:   'Marcelo Ricardo Leitner' <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>
To:     David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com>
Cc:     "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "'linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org'" <linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org>,
        Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>,
        'Catalin Marinas' <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
        "'kent.overstreet@gmail.com'" <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        'Neil Horman' <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] lib/generic-radix-tree: genradix bug fix and
 optimisations.
Message-ID: <20200825154127.GB2444@localhost.localdomain>
References: <21289d79b0474811b21ed8478c465159@AcuMS.aculab.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <21289d79b0474811b21ed8478c465159@AcuMS.aculab.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 02:52:34PM +0000, David Laight wrote:
> The genradix code is used by SCTP for accessing per-stream data.
> This means there are quite a lot of lookups but the code wasn't
> really optimised at all.

My test box is down for the moment and will bring it on later today or
tomorrow, so I can't test it yet. What should we expect as performance
gains here?

  Marcelo