Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:a0d1:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp3030688pxa; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 09:34:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzMbeC0YE9h9PMX0vCtY4nd12gAtNm7CeGcw5lj7VUJb3XI2wVHMDGqHvDXtXCM7R5AZXfE X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:2078:: with SMTP id qp24mr11295982ejb.286.1598373257038; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 09:34:17 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1598373257; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=UYLyPuoIe9ZLGLnZgO7Vv9uQLYWLwNjH8ozEtLaMiCIViqSM5kHlhA92TEJmQr+RAx ovFB+jLHTNvpp3dSb7i6bY/OOR+ALzRNsjPKdZJLrsojyuItsX10UQ/FkjOqlZFgbv5f /Z+OSw6XfO2TGeuxUADEKRYniG4PlxnTLufctJ4F8BZbnmSPlThGU0X6HIK9znmckIyD nC3BWv7e0lY8ruCRsnToA2P0hdBurIzj1IlbQ38yfG68NbCbHo+4PPiJEuGU3t8kOVPs 4Zbe62o89A2RROmbdtv0oqVZyH8/Hdwnu55dh48SxRcZ2ffBDg0vQXnglU7WcZpRDWBf YqHg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :dkim-signature; bh=L/YYXtkHKUaPE/tsOglLtbLhqc+vooSNTKXW0aTvskU=; b=l4pDUmmhydZPej3H8993Sh3te13+/DWr0JoqrnYRQ/tPexxgZif+Gle+WB7/+byVM6 Uaum/Mdis1moPoHFolBQr8TEHQPlvXywiXv0XEx/2EYXIyWab1yH0MukRN7pisKkAKCi 2bDLHwLeRyFFIsvvu5ElZIM92C4skB9NDWiZ3b/GDLXQmYwZ8dX+Pv3CGwaD3Dy8AEIW pMzP1CeChvTZuC3oGGH/kw494EXymj7+LXzqcPYEC3GxjSCn6QqnhknAtlCqc5cYHKaS EFHKDkGIRaPe8n0q/AYnSa5Rw004b9J460Wkj3Uf0OE22QBXY5nJJzZpcTLPDVtdU7qf 2OPg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=Ruck6EpD; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id jz19si592773ejb.241.2020.08.25.09.33.53; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 09:34:17 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=Ruck6EpD; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727091AbgHYQcg (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 25 Aug 2020 12:32:36 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:52726 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726938AbgHYQcb (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Aug 2020 12:32:31 -0400 Received: from mail-qk1-x730.google.com (mail-qk1-x730.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::730]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83111C061574; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 09:32:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-qk1-x730.google.com with SMTP id p4so11504321qkf.0; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 09:32:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=L/YYXtkHKUaPE/tsOglLtbLhqc+vooSNTKXW0aTvskU=; b=Ruck6EpDDJUMiWSpUI++B6KFoPI6MKPwhYk0mJmL4hlnavxCeSbo2k1DH0ZyxRdXzw C4hwdfBwXC5AZ2aQIDLTDMBI2mV8cSnY0IwKqdBHrKy4mPUSTEi/ozh8ITPSyV1CO+Ow 9ZaEL7RdIueOtZECnXOyxFtA3068aVVmdBc297+6mdFdQMKMBe6jLn4IC8XVLH9oCQNI KK1V5w1hHMD/DSzkL0YJ87fWEMIHqGVdQbsQow33rH3kj4ms9jKoPnE1dqqx6/P0ANFN jJEdc9l0+ZlrypGmSkplvwHUtm3oUFF500nTHUUOP+A3v3KY/dnu4TE0QhfnE4iagD6S uY9Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=L/YYXtkHKUaPE/tsOglLtbLhqc+vooSNTKXW0aTvskU=; b=H8Fnf458XFQGkYL7K3ZH00jUldV7H/VMbEjrmf9OyC3Er7X+uSJ4UmF6aEr6Uro1Vc AuAcEkgL3BdMh7Q+EGl8IW0aIM4OErm6HxgXEI78DN2+bTt+R7Vg0EZwAG0RXdZuI6mj A34bft841nRwjBXYeID4VDmPLyd76q+WIXstkwidgksxGwCRFnAGcqlSvs1O4oZK+LLR Dd+C0ZcfaJBKkP0y1QUPvLaz+VFDFJIduc2MjN3hUMb8jHL7BVxsI0dwJw2IfqoIuyRx DJFpfjGe6xMuPAT3of9TdNouzr7Ott0H9mc9qqLKfwB1lV0Dwjp5YK3scbtuAgdys/Ui AQXQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5303iXBPcRjnDku/c9nU6hbOXvuInG6Et3IYxAhTnM+/JFU27BoS WP5ChzFi0UwV38UuauzDyg== X-Received: by 2002:a37:9b15:: with SMTP id d21mr10444984qke.9.1598373150483; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 09:32:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zaphod.evilpiepirate.org ([2601:19b:c500:a1:144c:c173:c2b9:af15]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a3sm13699802qtj.21.2020.08.25.09.32.29 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 25 Aug 2020 09:32:29 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 12:32:24 -0400 From: Kent Overstreet To: David Laight Cc: 'Marcelo Ricardo Leitner' , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "'linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org'" , Eric Biggers , 'Catalin Marinas' , Andrew Morton , 'Neil Horman' Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] lib/generic-radix-tree: genradix bug fix and optimisations. Message-ID: <20200825163224.GA499490@zaphod.evilpiepirate.org> References: <21289d79b0474811b21ed8478c465159@AcuMS.aculab.com> <20200825154127.GB2444@localhost.localdomain> <17da427b99b444ce9d310d6542ae197e@AcuMS.aculab.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <17da427b99b444ce9d310d6542ae197e@AcuMS.aculab.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 04:00:35PM +0000, David Laight wrote: > From: 'Marcelo Ricardo Leitner' > > Sent: 25 August 2020 16:41 > > > > On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 02:52:34PM +0000, David Laight wrote: > > > The genradix code is used by SCTP for accessing per-stream data. > > > This means there are quite a lot of lookups but the code wasn't > > > really optimised at all. > > > > My test box is down for the moment and will bring it on later today or > > tomorrow, so I can't test it yet. What should we expect as performance > > gains here? > > Not sure, probably not much, but it ought to show up :-) > There'll be bigger gains on a cpu that has software ilog2(). > > I've only checked SCTP still works. > I've requested 32k streams on a listener - to force a level-2 tree. > I've also done at least one check with a massive pad in the sctp > stream structure. Have you benchmarked at all? Or were you looking at the generated assembly?