Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:a0d1:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp3221080pxa; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 15:08:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJywztNwSXhABXjoJuvK3gceaR/O/W3dqyup9mZOH27VkayraND+u7Paw3pMD17tMtdPurYt X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:174d:: with SMTP id v13mr11773832edx.231.1598393315690; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 15:08:35 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1598393315; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=wc0KqZoZzABxEv3ulVK2Sfm56AmvT3Uy/l1KUn4Jmuo6Rw8OmOh3qqgNvl1+74fFkl RIH66ciHymHaTYt/NA/sWeXGRsV0yVrbVDRjKaHtuLlHM+11ViKOc9rtpZ+FiNiAXmPF 8wliv9FG9RQkQ0od2ZWWC0szMdMLZibXIHP8X2keF1CP9wqu7iZPzgOIFphmTBMltpMQ HffKbr0eY07NHM50tR0ipTZYLXn71gtTpq2EZ0trIIuY8dRgq1zsdvWTr0U7Hm4sk0a6 a2umomXlX4XRlehWZZ1pctmF3tQRRnZEG2IuD5t/tR3rvBlO8iT13BoS48Eu+EQxM0Y4 GMqA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=vtpyyiGgWxb9fp/Rrrm8I9FtM3WAQxU78GcSdbciXr4=; b=FxVS7yuT7H6gnflF9BcxzAOdEJNQ/7I6b3UHaQaHNhIDhTW+dIFS1/q0FyCJBS7/go BezJ9NDI8AOzrQxYbOuw3cpQrvFiY96mVwUSRfujXe1F4B0AF2Vvdi4Z2vy7OmNv39U2 3XAoJS4afCsb91x4NHx29aFV8wAZYaT628D/hSlmBsJ3qXxq6GO91WGFuy0Cgma0Phub nE4NFCiMWJ6/6RQaq7RDeSRbW8kF9UES8g2m0xgpri1TEFfCQ8491tDOZH4tWIsrUQgT woOubks8ARbTLM3mDVHwWY2a1a2E/5AJh+hg+cvLQy5KuwLQiOV95wAJG2xnNJ5wSBv4 JJyg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id j1si121270edr.464.2020.08.25.15.08.12; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 15:08:35 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726656AbgHYWF3 (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 25 Aug 2020 18:05:29 -0400 Received: from mail109.syd.optusnet.com.au ([211.29.132.80]:53878 "EHLO mail109.syd.optusnet.com.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726303AbgHYWF3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Aug 2020 18:05:29 -0400 Received: from dread.disaster.area (pa49-181-146-199.pa.nsw.optusnet.com.au [49.181.146.199]) by mail109.syd.optusnet.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13A45D7D47D; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 08:05:24 +1000 (AEST) Received: from dave by dread.disaster.area with local (Exim 4.92.3) (envelope-from ) id 1kAh4E-0000RK-Vc; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 08:05:22 +1000 Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 08:05:22 +1000 From: Dave Chinner To: Matthew Wilcox Cc: Andreas Dilger , linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, "Darrick J . Wong" , linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] iomap: Change calling convention for zeroing Message-ID: <20200825220522.GO12131@dread.disaster.area> References: <20200824145511.10500-1-willy@infradead.org> <20200824145511.10500-10-willy@infradead.org> <20200825002735.GI12131@dread.disaster.area> <20200825032603.GL17456@casper.infradead.org> <20200825042711.GL12131@dread.disaster.area> <20200825124024.GN17456@casper.infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200825124024.GN17456@casper.infradead.org> X-Optus-CM-Score: 0 X-Optus-CM-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=QKgWuTDL c=1 sm=1 tr=0 cx=a_idp_d a=GorAHYkI+xOargNMzM6qxQ==:117 a=GorAHYkI+xOargNMzM6qxQ==:17 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=y4yBn9ojGxQA:10 a=7-415B0cAAAA:8 a=2U9gKF9mzcrskAPIHE4A:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=n3xvM8a_0i4A:10 a=biEYGPWJfzWAr4FL6Ov7:22 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 01:40:24PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > Any objection to leaving this patch as-is with a u64 length? No objection here - I just wanted to make sure that signed/unsigned overflow was not going to be an issue... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com